Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PCOV vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?

PCOV and YMAG both write options for income.

Principal Equity Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs.

0.0%PCOV cash paid, 1 year
35.5%YMAG cash paid, 1 year
−3.7%PCOV total return, 1 year
+9.7%YMAG total return, 1 year
PCOV3 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPY
YMAG1.5 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%YMAG+9.7%35.5% of it arrived as cash1.5 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%YMAG+9.7%35.5% cash1.5 pts behind MAGS

Performance, window by window

PCOV and YMAG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PCOVYMAGPCOVYMAGPCOVYMAG
3 monthsnot published+6.1%not published9.4%not published−1.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+15.4%not published21.1%not published−5.3 pts
1 yearnot published+9.7%not published35.5%not published−1.5 pts
Since launch−3.7%+70.7%0.0%89.1%−3.0 pts−34.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PCOV and YMAG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
YMAG
YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerPrincipalYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Magnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysnot establishedweekly
Payout rate, annualizednot published30.9%
Expense ratio0.34%1.34%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)35.5%
Price change, 1 year−3.7%−28.1%
Total return, 1 year−3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)+9.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year−0.7%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−3.0 pts−1.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published80%
Age30 days962 days
Net assetsnot published$297m

PCOV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.

YMAG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PCOV or YMAG?
PCOV charges 0.34% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PCOV against YMAG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PCOV against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pcov-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources