Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

XSHP vs XYLG: which paid, and which earned it?

XSHP and XYLG both write options for income.

Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

7.3%XSHP cash paid, 1 year
13.2%XYLG cash paid, 1 year
−13.1%XSHP total return, 1 year
+17.2%XYLG total return, 1 year
XSHP16.4 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPY
XYLG0.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XYLG+17.2%13.2% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XYLG+17.2%0.7 pts ahead of SPY

Performance, window by window

XSHP and XYLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
XSHPXYLGXSHPXYLGXSHPXYLG
3 months−11.0%+3.6%7.4%1.3%−13.3 pts+1.3 pts
6 monthsnot published+15.7%not published3.0%not published−2.3 pts
1 yearnot published+17.2%not published13.2%not published+0.7 pts
3 yearsnot published+60.9%not published43.0%not published−17.5 pts
Since launch−13.1%+114.0%7.3%69.0%−16.4 pts−38.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
XSHP and XYLG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XSHP
Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerKurvGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized33.5%4.4%
Expense ratio0.99%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)13.2%
Price change, 1 year−21.8%+2.6%
Total return, 1 year−13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)+17.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+3.3%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−16.4 pts+0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%80%
Age93 days2188 days
Net assets$7m$65m

XSHP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLG paid 13.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, XSHP or XYLG?
XSHP charges 0.99% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XSHP against XYLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XSHP against XYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xshp-vs-xylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources