Which is cheaper, PCOV or XYLG?

PCOV charges 0.34% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

PCOV vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

PCOV and XYLG both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

Net assets: $10m on Nov 2, 2026 for Principal Equity Premium Income ETF, and $72m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

PCOV on its own →XYLG on its own →

At a glance

1.9%

PCOV cash paid, since launch, Aug 19, 2026

12.7%

XYLG cash paid, 1 year

−0.1%

PCOV total return, since launch, Aug 19, 2026

+15.6%

XYLG total return, 1 year

PCOV · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

PCOV

−0.1%

none

Not measured

PCOV since launch: paid 1.9%, price −2.0%, total −0.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

PCOV

−0.1%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

PCOV since launch: paid 1.9%, price −2.0%, total −0.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

PCOV

−0.1%

1.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. PCOV since launch: paid 1.9%, price −2.0%, total −0.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

XYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 0.8 pts ahead of SPY

XYLG

+15.6%

SPY

+14.8%

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XYLG

+15.6%

12.7% of it arrived as cash

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XYLG

+15.6%

12.7% as cash

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

12.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.7%, price +1.5%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PCOV costs 0.01 points a year less; XYLG is 7.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

PCOV vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	PCOV	XYLG
Paid and earned
Measure	PCOV	XYLG
Total return, 1 year	not published	+15.6%
Price change	fell 2.0% (since Aug 19, 2026)	rose 1.5% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate		80% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	PCOV	XYLG
Benchmark	not published	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	PCOV	XYLG
Expense ratio	0.34%	0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$10m	$72m
Holdings
Measure	PCOV	XYLG
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Side by side

PCOV Principal Equity Premium Income ETF · Covered call XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly

Issuer Principal Global X

Strategy covered call covered call

Benchmark none S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays not established monthly

Payout rate, annualized 7.2% 4.4%

Expense ratio 0.34% 0.35%

Cash paid, 1 year 1.9% (since launch, Aug 19, 2026) 12.7%

Price change, 1 year −2.0% (since launch, Aug 19, 2026) +1.5%

Total return, 1 year −0.1% (since launch, Aug 19, 2026) +15.6%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%

Ahead or behind not available +0.8 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published 80%

Age 77 days 6.1 years

Net assets, PCOV as of Nov 2, 2026 and XYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 $10m $72m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: PCOV vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	PCOV	XYLG	PCOV	XYLG	PCOV	XYLG
3 months	–	+1.4%	–	1.1%	–	+1.5 pts
6 months	–	+6.7%	–	2.5%	–	+1.7 pts
1 year	–	+15.6%	–	12.7%	–	+0.8 pts
3 years	–	+65.6%	–	44.3%	–	−17.4 pts
Since launchNot the same days: PCOV Aug 2026 · XYLG Sep 2020	−0.1%	+116.0%	1.9%	69.8%	not measured	−38.4 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

PCOV

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 19, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, PCOV paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.1%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.2%, paid periodically.

XYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XYLG paid 12.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PCOV or XYLG?: PCOV charges 0.34% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

PCOV vs WDTE PCOV vs XRMI PCOV vs ACSP PCOV vs SPIN XYLG vs DDDD XYLG vs DYLG XYLG vs CDPI XYLG vs QQDH

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →PCOV on its own →XYLG on its own →PCOV dividend history →XYLG dividend history →XYLG holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

PCOV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

PCOV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Principal website ↗

XYLG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XYLG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

XYLG 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Global X page for XYLG ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PCOV against XYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pcov-vs-xylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.