Data as of .
NLSI vs XSHP: which paid, and which earned it?
NLSI and XSHP both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLSI | XSHP | NLSI | XSHP | NLSI | XSHP | |
| 3 months | +15.6% | −11.0% | 1.4% | 7.4% | +13.3 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 6 months | +24.6% | not published | 2.8% | not published | +6.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +19.3% | −13.1% | 4.0% | 7.3% | +7.3 pts | −16.4 pts |
| NLSI NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | XSHP Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Kurv |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 5.1% | 33.5% |
| Expense ratio | 2.89% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 4.0% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025) | 7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +14.6% | −21.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.3% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025) | −13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +12.0% | +3.3% |
| Ahead or behind | +7.3 pts | −16.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 94% |
| Age | 282 days | 93 days |
| Net assets | $5m | $7m |
NLSI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 10, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, NLSI paid 4.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 31, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XSHP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, NLSI or XSHP?
- NLSI charges 2.89% a year and XSHP charges 0.99%, so XSHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NLSI against XSHP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nlsi-vs-xshp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.