Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NLSI vs PCOV: which paid, and which earned it?

NLSI and PCOV both write options for income.

NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF and Principal Equity Premium Income ETF.

4.0%NLSI cash paid, 1 year
0.0%PCOV cash paid, 1 year
+19.3%NLSI total return, 1 year
−3.7%PCOV total return, 1 year
NLSI7.3 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+12.0%NLSI+19.3%4.0% as cash7.3 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+12.0%NLSI+19.3%7.3 pts ahead of SPY
PCOV3 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPY

Performance, window by window

NLSI and PCOV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
NLSIPCOVNLSIPCOVNLSIPCOV
3 months+15.6%not published1.4%not published+13.3 ptsnot published
6 months+24.6%not published2.8%not published+6.6 ptsnot published
Since launch+19.3%−3.7%4.0%0.0%+7.3 pts−3.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NLSI and PCOV on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NLSI
NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
IssuerNEOSPrincipal
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlynot established
Payout rate, annualized5.1%not published
Expense ratio2.89%0.34%
Cash paid, 1 year4.0% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025)0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+14.6%−3.7%
Total return, 1 year+19.3% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025)−3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+12.0%−0.7%
Ahead or behind+7.3 pts−3.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age282 days30 days
Net assets$5mnot published

NLSI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Dec 10, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, NLSI paid 4.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 31, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

PCOV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, NLSI or PCOV?
NLSI charges 2.89% a year and PCOV charges 0.34%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NLSI against PCOV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NLSI against PCOV, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nlsi-vs-pcov Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources