Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NLSI vs RECI: which paid, and which earned it?

NLSI and RECI both write options for income.

NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF and Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF.

4.0%NLSI cash paid, 1 year
0.7%RECI cash paid, 1 year
+19.3%NLSI total return, 1 year
+2.4%RECI total return, 1 year
NLSI7.3 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+12.0%NLSI+19.3%4.0% as cash7.3 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+12.0%NLSI+19.3%7.3 pts ahead of SPY
RECI0.8 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPY

Performance, window by window

NLSI and RECI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
NLSIRECINLSIRECINLSIRECI
3 months+15.6%not published1.4%not published+13.3 ptsnot published
6 months+24.6%not published2.8%not published+6.6 ptsnot published
Since launch+19.3%+2.4%4.0%0.7%+7.3 pts+0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NLSI and RECI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NLSI
NEOS Long/Short Equity Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
RECI
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
IssuerNEOSColumbia
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlynot established
Payout rate, annualized5.1%8.0%
Expense ratio2.89%0.30%
Cash paid, 1 year4.0% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025)0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+14.6%+1.7%
Total return, 1 year+19.3% (since launch on Dec 10, 2025)+2.4% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+12.0%+1.6%
Ahead or behind+7.3 pts+0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age282 days66 days
Net assets$5mnot published

NLSI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Dec 10, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, NLSI paid 4.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 31, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

RECI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, RECI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, NLSI or RECI?
NLSI charges 2.89% a year and RECI charges 0.30%, so RECI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NLSI against RECI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NLSI against RECI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nlsi-vs-reci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources