Data as of .
SCLZ vs XSHP: which paid, and which earned it?
SCLZ and XSHP both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | XSHP | SCLZ | XSHP | SCLZ | XSHP | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | −11.0% | 2.1% | 7.4% | −3.6 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 6 months | +14.2% | not published | 3.8% | not published | +1.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +13.2% | not published | 8.4% | not published | −14.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +36.5% | −13.1% | 19.6% | 7.3% | −6.3 pts | −16.4 pts |
| SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | XSHP Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Swan | Kurv |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.5% | 33.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.4% | 7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.1% | −21.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.2% | −13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +3.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.0 pts | −16.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 94% |
| Age | 934 days | 93 days |
| Net assets | $20m | $7m |
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
XSHP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, SCLZ or XSHP?
- SCLZ charges 0.79% a year and XSHP charges 0.99%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCLZ against XSHP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-xshp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.