Data as of .
TDVI vs XLSI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XLSI paid 11.8% of its price in cash against TDVI’s 8.1%, though TDVI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLSI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TDVI and XLSI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | TDVI | XLSI |
|---|---|---|
| US Dollar | 0.74% | 0.07% |
| Only in TDVI | Only in XLSI |
|---|---|
| Texas Instruments Incorporated 8.22% | STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES 99.85% |
| Oracle Corporation 7.97% | SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.75% |
| International Business Machines Corporat 7.90% | STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 86 C -0.17% |
| Microsoft Corporation 7.83% | STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 85 C -0.50% |
| Broadcom Inc. 7.77% | |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.21% | |
| QUALCOMM Incorporated 4.19% | |
| Analog Devices, Inc. 3.19% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDVI | XLSI | TDVI | XLSI | TDVI | XLSI | |
| 3 months | −2.9% | +1.2% | 1.9% | 3.1% | −2.1 pts | +6.3 pts |
| 6 months | +21.2% | +4.9% | 4.5% | 6.2% | −19.2 pts | +1.4 pts |
| 1 year | +17.1% | +5.5% | 8.1% | 11.8% | −20.9 pts | +12.5 pts |
| 3 years | +101.3% | not published | 31.3% | not published | −26.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +101.0% | +4.8% | 31.3% | 12.7% | −29.0 pts | +4.5 pts |
| TDVI FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on XLK, paying monthly | XLSI State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF Covered call on XLY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | State Street |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | Technology sector (XLK) | Consumer discretionary (XLY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 7.9% | 9.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.1% | 11.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.2% | −6.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.1% | +5.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +38.0% | −6.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −20.9 pts | +12.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1135 days | 415 days |
| Net assets | $631m | $18m |
TDVI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDVI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.1%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 20.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.9%, paid monthly.
XLSI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. Consumer discretionary (XLY) returned −6.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, TDVI or XLSI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDVI paid 8.1% of its starting price in cash and XLSI paid 11.8%, so XLSI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, TDVI or XLSI?
- With every distribution reinvested, TDVI returned +17.1% and XLSI returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TDVI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, TDVI or XLSI?
- TDVI charges 0.75% a year and XLSI charges 0.35%, so XLSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TDVI against XLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tdvi-vs-xlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.