Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AIPI vs XLSI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year AIPI paid 31.3% of its price in cash against XLSI’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

31.3%AIPI cash paid, 1 year
11.8%XLSI cash paid, 1 year
+22.2%AIPI total return, 1 year
+5.5%XLSI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLSI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

AIPI 26XLSI 67.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AIPI9.4 pts behind AIQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
AIQ+31.6%AIPI+22.2%31.3% of it arrived as cash9.4 pts behind AIQTotal return, distributions reinvestedAIQ+31.6%AIPI+22.2%31.3% cash9.4 pts behind AIQ
XLSI12.5 pts ahead of XLY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%11.8% cash12.5 pts ahead of XLYTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%12.5 pts ahead of XLY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AIPI and XLSI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in AIPIOnly in XLSI
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. 11.93%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES 99.58%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 8.40%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.83%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.23%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 86 CALL -0.10%
Astera Labs, Inc 7.20%STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 85 CALL -0.30%
DATADOG, INC. 6.65%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.15%
SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC. 3.95%
IONQ Inc 3.62%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

AIPI and XLSI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
AIPIXLSIAIPIXLSIAIPIXLSI
3 months+7.7%+1.2%8.4%3.1%+11.7 pts+6.3 pts
6 months+24.6%+4.9%17.8%6.2%−10.8 pts+1.4 pts
1 year+22.2%+5.5%31.3%11.8%−9.4 pts+12.5 pts
Since launch+56.1%+4.8%64.2%12.7%−35.1 pts+4.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AIPI and XLSI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AIPI
REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF
Covered call on AIQ, paying weekly
XLSI
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLY, paying monthly
IssuerREXState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkAI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxyConsumer discretionary (XLY)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized34.4%9.3%
Expense ratio0.65%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year31.3%11.8%
Price change, 1 year−13.8%−6.5%
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+31.6%−6.9%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts+12.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age836 days415 days
Net assets$466m$20m

AIPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, AIPI paid 31.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy returned +31.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.4%, paid weekly. REX estimates that 100% of the distribution paid was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XLSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. Consumer discretionary (XLY) returned −6.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, AIPI or XLSI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, AIPI paid 31.3% of its starting price in cash and XLSI paid 11.8%, so AIPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, AIPI or XLSI?
With every distribution reinvested, AIPI returned +22.2% and XLSI returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so AIPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, AIPI or XLSI?
AIPI charges 0.65% a year and XLSI charges 0.35%, so XLSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AIPI against XLSI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIPI against XLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aipi-vs-xlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources