SLVI vs SLVY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
SLVI and SLVY both write options for income. Net assets: $2m on Oct 13, 2026 for NEOS Silver High Income ETF, and $942,945 on Oct 14, 2026 for FT Vest Silver Strategy & Target Income ETF.
SLVI costs 0.07 points a year less; SLVI is 1.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| SLVI | SLVY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.78% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 13, 2026 | $2m | $1m |
| What it tracks | SLV | SLV |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Price change | fell 6.3% (since Oct 7, 2026) | fell 8.2% (since Jul 9, 2026) |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 13, 2026 and Oct 14, 2026.
About even with SLV
SLVI since launch: paid 0.0%, price −6.3%, total −6.3%, SLV −6.7%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
SLV
−6.7%
SLVI
−6.3%
about even with SLV
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SLV
SLVI since launch: paid 0.0%, price −6.3%, total −6.3%, SLV −6.7%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
SLV
−6.7%
SLVI
−6.3%
about even with SLV
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. SLVI since launch: paid 0.0%, price −6.3%, total −6.3%, SLV −6.7%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
0.7 pts ahead of SLV
SLVY since launch: paid 1.8%, price −8.2%, total −6.6%, SLV −7.2%, +0.7 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
SLV
−7.2%
SLVY
−6.6%
0.7 pts ahead of SLV
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.7 pts ahead of SLV
SLVY since launch: paid 1.8%, price −8.2%, total −6.6%, SLV −7.2%, +0.7 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
SLV
−7.2%
SLVY
−6.6%
0.7 pts ahead of SLV
1.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SLVY since launch: paid 1.8%, price −8.2%, total −6.6%, SLV −7.2%, +0.7 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SLVI and SLVY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 13, 2026 and Oct 14, 2026.
half
0% in common
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SLVI | SLVY | SLVI | SLVY | SLVI | SLVY |
| 3 months | not published | −3.4% | not published | 1.9% | not published | +0.5 pts |
| Since launch Not the same days: SLVI Oct 2026 · SLVY Jul 2026 | −6.3% | −6.6% | 0.0% | 1.8% | +0.4 pts | +0.7 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 14, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid is what the fund distributed over the window, as a share of its price at the start. Payout rate is its latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
About SLVI
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026, SLVI paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.3%. Silver (SLV) returned −6.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
About SLVY
Over the period from its first trade on Jul 9, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026, SLVY paid 1.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.6%. Silver (SLV) returned −7.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Oct 14, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SLVI against SLVY, data as of Oct 14, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/slvi-vs-slvy
ETFIQ. (Oct 14, 2026). SLVI against SLVY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/slvi-vs-slvy
[SLVI against SLVY (ETFIQ, Oct 14, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/slvi-vs-slvy)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.