Data as of .
SCLZ vs YLDE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year SCLZ paid 8.4% of its price in cash against YLDE’s 7.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YLDE scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCLZ and YLDE hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCLZ | YLDE |
|---|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC | 5.18% | 3.60% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 5.99% | 3.03% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.71% | 2.67% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY | 3.50% | 2.51% |
| BROADCOM INC | 4.71% | 2.25% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.41% | 1.99% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORP | 1.92% | 4.05% |
| APPLE INC | 6.15% | 1.91% |
| VISA INC | 2.27% | 1.83% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.34% | 1.63% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) | 1.51% | 1.39% |
| RTX CORP | 1.35% | 1.00% |
| Only in SCLZ | Only in YLDE |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.89% | NESTLE' SA/AG 2.94% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14% | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC 2.83% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% | APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 2.78% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.75% | UNILEVER PLC 2.64% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.10% | PUBLIC STORAGE 2.59% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.01% | MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC 2.52% |
| GE AEROSPACE 2.74% | OTIS WORLDWIDE CORP 2.49% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 1.84% | UNION PACIFIC CORP 2.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | YLDE | SCLZ | YLDE | SCLZ | YLDE | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +2.5% | 2.1% | 2.3% | −3.6 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +14.2% | +8.4% | 3.8% | 4.1% | +1.6 pts | −9.6 pts |
| 1 year | +13.2% | +10.5% | 8.4% | 7.6% | −14.0 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +51.1% | not published | 16.8% | not published | −27.3 pts |
| Since launch | +36.5% | +181.4% | 19.6% | 42.1% | −6.3 pts | −86.6 pts |
| SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | YLDE Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Swan | Franklin |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.5% | 7.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.48% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.4% | 7.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.1% | +2.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.2% | +10.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.0 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 934 days | 3405 days |
| Net assets | $20m | $170m |
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
YLDE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YLDE paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, SCLZ or YLDE?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting price in cash and YLDE paid 7.6%, so SCLZ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, SCLZ or YLDE?
- With every distribution reinvested, SCLZ returned +13.2% and YLDE returned +10.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SCLZ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, SCLZ or YLDE?
- SCLZ charges 0.79% a year and YLDE charges 0.48%, so YLDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCLZ against YLDE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-ylde Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.