Data as of .
DOGG vs SCLZ: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year DOGG paid 9.6% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DOGG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and SCLZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DOGG | SCLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Amgen Inc. | 6.33% | 0.36% |
| Only in DOGG | Only in SCLZ |
|---|---|
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.89% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. 7.18% | APPLE INC 6.15% |
| The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47% | NVIDIA CORP 5.99% |
| Chevron Corporation 5.81% | ALPHABET INC 5.18% |
| Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14% |
| The Coca-Cola Company 5.47% | BROADCOM INC 4.71% |
| McDonald's Corporation 4.92% | ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. 4.78% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGG | SCLZ | DOGG | SCLZ | DOGG | SCLZ | |
| 3 months | +2.5% | +2.9% | 2.3% | 2.1% | +2.1 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +3.9% | +14.2% | 4.5% | 3.8% | −10.1 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 1 year | +18.1% | +13.2% | 9.6% | 8.4% | +4.6 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 3 years | +40.2% | not published | 28.0% | not published | −16.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +43.7% | +36.5% | 30.9% | 19.6% | −17.9 pts | −6.3 pts |
| DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Swan |
| Strategy | option income | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 8.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.6% | 8.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | +4.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.1% | +13.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.6 pts | −14.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1240 days | 934 days |
| Net assets | $87m | $20m |
DOGG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DOGG or SCLZ?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.4%, so DOGG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DOGG or SCLZ?
- With every distribution reinvested, DOGG returned +18.1% and SCLZ returned +13.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DOGG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DOGG or SCLZ?
- DOGG charges 0.75% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so DOGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOGG against SCLZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-sclz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.