Data as of .
DOGG vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
DOGG and YSPC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and YSPC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DOGG | Only in YSPC |
|---|---|
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94% | United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 43.24% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. 7.18% | United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 34.02% |
| The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 16.09% |
| Amgen Inc. 6.33% | SPCX 10/16/2026 150.01 C 6.39% |
| Chevron Corporation 5.81% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 5.82% |
| Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 162.500 0.62% |
| The Coca-Cola Company 5.47% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 157.500 0.07% |
| McDonald's Corporation 4.92% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 152.500 -0.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGG | YSPC | DOGG | YSPC | DOGG | YSPC | |
| 3 months | +2.5% | not published | 2.3% | not published | +2.1 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +3.9% | not published | 4.5% | not published | −10.1 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +18.1% | not published | 9.6% | not published | +4.6 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +40.2% | not published | 28.0% | not published | −16.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +43.7% | +6.4% | 30.9% | 10.9% | −17.9 pts | +5.3 pts |
| DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.6% | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.1% | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.6 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 1240 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $87m | $32m |
DOGG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DOGG or YSPC?
- DOGG charges 0.75% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so DOGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOGG against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.