Data as of .
SCLZ vs SPIN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year SCLZ paid 8.4% of its price in cash against SPIN’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SPIN scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCLZ and SPIN hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCLZ | SPIN |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC | 6.15% | 6.07% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 5.99% | 9.79% |
| ALPHABET INC | 5.18% | 5.65% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.75% | 4.84% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.71% | 7.15% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.34% | 3.24% |
| BROADCOM INC | 4.71% | 3.16% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 7.89% | 2.82% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 5.14% | 2.55% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY | 3.50% | 2.10% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY | 3.86% | 2.01% |
| VISA INC | 2.27% | 1.48% |
| Only in SCLZ | Only in SPIN |
|---|---|
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 3.01% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.08% |
| GE AEROSPACE 2.74% | APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.44% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.92% | AMPHENOL CORP CL A 1.30% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 1.84% | BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.26% |
| ABBVIE INC 1.82% | EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.18% |
| DEERE & COMPANY 1.17% | WABTEC CORP 1.15% |
| DUKE ENERGY CORP 1.01% | PARKER HANNIFIN CORP 1.14% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 0.88% | S+P GLOBAL INC 1.14% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | SPIN | SCLZ | SPIN | SCLZ | SPIN | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +3.7% | 2.1% | 0.8% | −3.6 pts | +1.4 pts |
| 6 months | +14.2% | +12.3% | 3.8% | 3.2% | +1.6 pts | −5.8 pts |
| 1 year | +13.2% | +11.3% | 8.4% | 5.2% | −14.0 pts | −5.2 pts |
| Since launch | +36.5% | +28.5% | 19.6% | 15.2% | −6.3 pts | −13.7 pts |
| SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | SPIN State Street(R) US Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Swan | State Street |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.5% | 2.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.4% | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.1% | +5.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.2% | +11.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.0 pts | −5.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 934 days | 743 days |
| Net assets | $20m | $47m |
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
SPIN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPIN paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, SCLZ or SPIN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting price in cash and SPIN paid 5.2%, so SCLZ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, SCLZ or SPIN?
- With every distribution reinvested, SCLZ returned +13.2% and SPIN returned +11.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SCLZ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, SCLZ or SPIN?
- SCLZ charges 0.79% a year and SPIN charges 0.25%, so SPIN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCLZ against SPIN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-spin Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.