Data as of .
ROCQ vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?
ROCQ and XRMI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ROCQ and XRMI hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ROCQ | XRMI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.37% | 8.27% |
| Apple, Inc. | 7.12% | 7.54% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 5.03% | 5.63% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 4.52% | 3.82% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 2.93% | 2.61% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 2.94% | 2.26% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 6.70% | 1.76% |
| Tesla, Inc. | 2.94% | 1.58% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 0.95% | 1.00% |
| Intel Corp. | 3.58% | 0.82% |
| Walmart, Inc. | 3.50% | 0.72% |
| AbbVie, Inc. | 0.65% | 0.72% |
| Only in ROCQ | Only in XRMI |
|---|---|
| Alphabet, Inc. 6.30% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.74% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plc 2.77% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.46% |
| ASML Holding NV 1.60% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.44% |
| Palantir Technologies, Inc. 0.95% | ELI LILLY & CO 1.42% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 0.77% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.40% |
| AppLovin Corp. 0.65% | CASH 1.11% |
| Mondelez International, Inc. 0.64% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROCQ | XRMI | ROCQ | XRMI | ROCQ | XRMI | |
| 3 months | 0.0% | +3.5% | 3.0% | 3.0% | +2.5 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +20.0% | +8.9% | 5.9% | 6.3% | −4.2 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +10.3% | not published | 12.1% | not published | −6.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +27.2% | not published | 33.3% | not published | −51.2 pts |
| Since launch | +18.0% | +17.0% | 5.8% | 43.8% | −4.0 pts | −66.1 pts |
| ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) | 12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +12.0% | −2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) | +10.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.0 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 95% |
| Age | 183 days | 1849 days |
| Net assets | $629m | $60m |
ROCQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.
XRMI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ROCQ against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rocq-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.