Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLG vs YLDE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against YLDE’s 7.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF and Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF.

17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
7.6%YLDE cash paid, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year
+10.5%YLDE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLG 71.1YLDE 56.23.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% as cashabout even with QQQ
YLDE6 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%YLDE+10.5%7.6% of it arrived as cash6 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%YLDE+10.5%6 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and YLDE hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QYLG and YLDE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQYLGYLDE
ALPHABET INC-CL A3.23%3.60%
NVIDIA CORP8.44%3.03%
MICROSOFT CORP5.77%2.67%
BROADCOM INC2.67%2.25%
APPLE INC7.73%1.91%
META PLATFORMS INC3.11%1.63%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC1.06%2.28%
LINDE PLC0.92%1.56%
T-MOBILE US INC0.78%1.67%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING0.47%2.05%
COMCAST CORP-CLASS A0.35%2.23%
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC0.28%0.63%
Only in each
Only in QYLGOnly in YLDE
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99%WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE) 4.63%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.31%EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 4.05%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97%NESTLE' SA/AG 2.94%
TESLA INC 3.01%AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC 2.83%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.00%APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 2.78%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.85%UNILEVER PLC 2.64%
INTEL CORP 2.48%PUBLIC STORAGE 2.59%
WALMART INC 2.25%MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC 2.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLG and YLDE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLGYLDEQYLGYLDEQYLGYLDE
3 months−0.1%+2.5%2.1%2.3%+2.4 pts+0.3 pts
6 months+19.6%+8.4%4.6%4.1%−4.7 pts−9.6 pts
1 year+22.2%+10.5%17.4%7.6%+0.5 pts−6.0 pts
3 years+76.2%+51.1%51.1%16.8%−22.0 pts−27.3 pts
Since launch+122.0%+181.4%75.3%42.1%−52.0 pts−86.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLG and YLDE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
YLDE
Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XFranklin
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.8%7.0%
Expense ratio0.35%0.48%
Cash paid, 1 year17.4%7.6%
Price change, 1 year+2.4%+2.6%
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+10.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+0.5 pts−6.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate96%not published
Age2187 days3405 days
Net assets$175m$170m

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

YLDE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YLDE paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLG or YLDE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting price in cash and YLDE paid 7.6%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLG or YLDE?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLG returned +22.2% and YLDE returned +10.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLG or YLDE?
QYLG charges 0.35% a year and YLDE charges 0.48%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLG against YLDE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLG against YLDE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-ylde Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources