Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DOGG vs QYLG: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against DOGG’s 9.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

9.6%DOGG cash paid, 1 year
17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
+18.1%DOGG total return, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DOGG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DOGG 88.8QYLG 71.13.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DOGG4.6 pts ahead of DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%DOGG+18.1%9.6% of it arrived as cash4.6 pts ahead of DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%DOGG+18.1%4.6 pts ahead of DIA
QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% as cashabout even with QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and QYLG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DOGG and QYLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDOGGQYLG
Amgen Inc.6.33%0.91%
Only in each
Only in DOGGOnly in QYLG
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94%NVIDIA CORP 8.44%
Merck & Co., Inc. 7.18%APPLE INC 7.73%
The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47%MICROSOFT CORP 5.77%
Chevron Corporation 5.81%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.99%
Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55%AMAZON.COM INC 4.31%
The Coca-Cola Company 5.47%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.97%
McDonald's Corporation 4.92%ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.23%
The Home Depot, Inc. 4.78%META PLATFORMS INC 3.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DOGG and QYLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DOGGQYLGDOGGQYLGDOGGQYLG
3 months+2.5%−0.1%2.3%2.1%+2.1 pts+2.4 pts
6 months+3.9%+19.6%4.5%4.6%−10.1 pts−4.7 pts
1 year+18.1%+22.2%9.6%17.4%+4.6 pts+0.5 pts
3 years+40.2%+76.2%28.0%51.1%−16.7 pts−22.0 pts
Since launch+43.7%+122.0%30.9%75.3%−17.9 pts−52.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DOGG and QYLG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
Option income on DIA, paying monthly
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustGlobal X
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized9.1%6.8%
Expense ratio0.75%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year9.6%17.4%
Price change, 1 year+8.0%+2.4%
Total return, 1 year+18.1%+22.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+13.5%+21.8%
Ahead or behind+4.6 pts+0.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published96%
Age1240 days2187 days
Net assets$87m$175m

DOGG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DOGG or QYLG?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting price in cash and QYLG paid 17.4%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DOGG or QYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, DOGG returned +18.1% and QYLG returned +22.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, DOGG or QYLG?
DOGG charges 0.75% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DOGG against QYLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOGG against QYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-qylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources