Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLD vs XYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QYLD paid 12.5% of its price in cash against XYLD’s 11.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

12.5%QYLD cash paid, 1 year
11.0%XYLD cash paid, 1 year
+22.2%QYLD total return, 1 year
+17.9%XYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLD 77.5XYLD 72.13.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLD0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QYLD+22.2%12.5% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QYLD+22.2%12.5% cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
XYLD1.2 pts behind ACWI · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
ACWI+19.1%XYLD+17.9%11.0% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts behind ACWITotal return, distributions reinvestedACWI+19.1%XYLD+17.9%1.2 pts behind ACWI

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLD and XYLD hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QYLD and XYLD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQYLDXYLD
NVIDIA CORP8.46%8.01%
APPLE INC7.81%7.39%
MICROSOFT CORP5.90%5.58%
AMAZON.COM INC4.42%3.81%
ALPHABET INC-CL A3.16%3.01%
BROADCOM INC2.75%2.60%
ALPHABET INC-CL C2.93%2.40%
META PLATFORMS INC3.07%2.16%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC4.86%1.66%
TESLA INC2.92%1.56%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.72%1.27%
INTEL CORP2.29%0.77%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QYLDOnly in XYLD
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 1.28%JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.44%
SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 0.69%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.41%
ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS 0.68%ELI LILLY & CO 1.33%
ARM HOLDINGS PLC-ADR 0.48%EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.04%
MERCADOLIBRE INC 0.43%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.96%
ASTERA LABS INC 0.22%VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 0.94%
NEBIUS GROUP NV 0.22%MASTERCARD INC - A 0.70%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 0.22%ABBVIE INC 0.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLD and XYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLDXYLDQYLDXYLDQYLDXYLD
3 months+4.7%+5.0%3.0%2.6%+5.5 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+11.8%+10.5%6.2%5.5%−8.9 pts−5.1 pts
1 year+22.2%+17.9%12.5%11.0%−0.7 pts−1.2 pts
3 years+51.3%+43.2%36.6%32.9%−43.8 pts−32.8 pts
Since launch+195.4%+190.8%116.0%112.9%−639.0 pts−133.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLD and XYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on ACWI, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)All-country world (ACWI)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.9%9.0%
Expense ratio0.60%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%11.0%
Price change, 1 year+8.4%+5.9%
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+17.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+19.1%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%93%
Age4656 days4827 days

QYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XYLD paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +19.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLD or XYLD?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.0%, so QYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLD or XYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLD returned +22.2% and XYLD returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLD or XYLD?
QYLD charges 0.60% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLD against XYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLD against XYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qyld-vs-xyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources