Data as of .
GPIQ vs XYLD: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year GPIQ paid 11.1% of its price in cash against XYLD’s 11.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and XYLD hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GPIQ | XYLD |
|---|---|---|
| LINDE PLC | 1.11% | 0.33% |
| SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC | 0.90% | 0.29% |
| NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Only in GPIQ | Only in XYLD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.48% | NVIDIA CORP 8.01% |
| APPLE INC 6.59% | APPLE INC 7.39% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.58% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.20% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.81% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.01% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.96% | BROADCOM INC 2.60% |
| ALPHABET INC 3.54% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.40% |
| TESLA INC 3.17% | META PLATFORMS INC 2.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | XYLD | GPIQ | XYLD | GPIQ | XYLD | |
| 3 months | −0.4% | +5.0% | 2.6% | 2.6% | +0.4 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +17.3% | +10.5% | 5.8% | 5.5% | −3.4 pts | −5.1 pts |
| 1 year | +21.9% | +17.9% | 11.1% | 11.0% | −1.1 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +43.2% | not published | 32.9% | not published | −32.8 pts |
| Since launch | +96.4% | +190.8% | 38.2% | 112.9% | −15.0 pts | −133.7 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF Covered call on ACWI, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | All-country world (ACWI) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.6% | 9.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.1% | 11.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.8% | +5.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.9% | +17.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.0% | +19.1% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.1 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 93% |
| Age | 1051 days | 4827 days |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.
XYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XYLD paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +19.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIQ or XYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.1% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.0%, so GPIQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or XYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +21.9% and XYLD returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, GPIQ or XYLD?
- GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against XYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-xyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.