Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

QDTE vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QDTE paid 34.2% of its price in cash against XYLD’s 10.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QDTE and XYLD

Net assets: $919m on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, and $3.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
34.2%
QDTE cash paid, 1 year
10.6%
XYLD cash paid, 1 year
+16.5%
QDTE total return, 1 year
+15.8%
XYLD total return, 1 year
QDTE · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 1.3 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE
+16.5%
QQQ
+15.2%

1.3 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.2%, price −21.6%, total +16.5%, QQQ +15.2%, +1.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

QDTE

+16.5%

34.2% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.2%, price −21.6%, total +16.5%, QQQ +15.2%, +1.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

QDTE

+16.5%

34.2% as cash

1.3 pts ahead of QQQ

34.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.2%, price −21.6%, total +16.5%, QQQ +15.2%, +1.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
XYLD · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 2.2 pts ahead of SPY
XYLD
+15.8%
SPY
+13.6%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +4.3%, total +15.8%, SPY +13.6%, +2.2 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

SPY

+13.6%

XYLD

+15.8%

10.6% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +4.3%, total +15.8%, SPY +13.6%, +2.2 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

SPY

+13.6%

XYLD

+15.8%

10.6% cash

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

10.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.6%, price +4.3%, total +15.8%, SPY +13.6%, +2.2 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XYLD costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; XYLD is 3.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QDTE vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQDTEXYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+15.8%
Price change, 1 yearfell 21.6%rose 4.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment93% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.96%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$950m$3.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · XYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score35.1QDTE77.7XYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

A percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 136 weekly returns
QDTE XYLD
Return
Total return edge QDTE +60.8% +36.5%
Annualized edge QDTE +19.9% +12.6%
Price return edge XYLD −38.8% +1.5%
Risk
Volatility edge XYLD 17.8% 9.1%
Max drawdown edge XYLD −20.5% −14.0%
Downside capture 91.4% 70.9%
Beta 0.85 0.66
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.87 0.88
Sortino edge QDTE (slight) 1.27 1.24
Treynor 0.182 0.103
Calmar edge QDTE (slight) 0.97 0.90
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.2% a year −1.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.39 −1.00
Information ratio −0.23 −0.75
Tracking error 5.7% 7.8%

Each against its own benchmark: QDTE against QQQ, Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026; XYLD against SPY, Jul 5, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QDTE returned more: +60.8% to +36.5%. XYLD swung less: 9.1% to 17.8%. XYLD fell less at its worst: −14.0% to −20.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QDTE vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQDTEXYLDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+60.8%+36.5%QDTEPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.9%+12.6%QDTETotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−38.8%+1.5%XYLDPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility17.8%9.1%XYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation12.2%6.5%XYLDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−20.5%−14.0%XYLDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture81.9%51.3%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture91.4%70.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.850.66Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.930.78Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.870.88TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.271.24QDTE (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1820.103Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.970.90QDTE (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.2% a year−1.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.39−1.00Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.8% to +7.2%−4.5% to +1.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.23−0.75Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.7%7.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 136 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and XYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QDTE XYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QDTE
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 73.81%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.75%
Only in XYLD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.64%
APPLE INC. 7.13%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.42%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.18%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%
ALPHABET INC. 2.65%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QDTE Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy 0DTE covered call covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 20.7% 9.1%
Expense ratio 0.96% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 34.2% 10.6%
Price change, 1 year −21.6% +4.3%
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +15.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +15.2% +13.6%
Ahead or behind +1.3 pts +2.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 93%
Age 2.6 years 13.3 years
Net assets, QDTE as of Oct 28, 2026 and XYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $919m $3.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QDTE vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowQDTEXYLDQDTEXYLDQDTEXYLD
3 months+9.5%+5.0%6.6%2.3%−0.3 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+10.2%+9.2%14.9%5.2%+0.3 pts+0.1 pts
1 year+16.5%+15.8%34.2%10.6%+1.3 pts+2.2 pts
3 years–+53.3%–35.1%–−41.7 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QDTE Mar 2024 · XYLD Jun 2013+61.4%+195.1%75.3%114.5%−3.8 pts−320.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-40AD0CA90B

QDTE and XYLD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Income paid. QDTE paid 34.2% and XYLD 10.6% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 23.6 points.
  2. What each is measured against. QDTE is measured against Nasdaq-100 through QQQ and XYLD against S&P 500 through SPY.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QDTE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QDTE

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QDTE paid 34.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.3 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.7%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

XYLD

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, XYLD paid 10.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or XYLD?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QDTE paid 34.2% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 10.6%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or XYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +16.5% and XYLD +15.8% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or XYLD?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QDTE against XYLD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-xyld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.