Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLD vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XDTE paid 26.9% of its price in cash against QYLD’s 12.5%, though QYLD returned more with it reinvested.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

12.5%QYLD cash paid, 1 year
26.9%XDTE cash paid, 1 year
+21.8%QYLD total return, 1 year
+16.1%XDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QYLD 82.6XDTE 44.83.8, the lowest in this set96.3, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QYLDAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 14, 2026
QQQ+21.5%QYLD+21.8%12.5% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.5%QYLD+21.8%12.5% cashabout even with QQQ
XDTE0.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 14, 2026
SPY+17.0%XDTE+16.1%26.9% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.0%XDTE+16.1%26.9% as cash0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QYLD and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QYLDOnly in XDTE
NVIDIA CORP 8.55%SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 66.29%
APPLE INC 7.89%SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 24.62%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.96%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.26%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.91%First American Government Obligations Fu 1.83%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.47%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.76%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.19%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 11, 2026 and Sep 14, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QYLD and XDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLDXDTEQYLDXDTEQYLDXDTE
3 months+3.7%+1.6%3.0%5.0%+8.3 pts+0.6 pts
6 months+10.2%+11.6%6.1%10.4%−8.2 pts−2.7 pts
1 year+21.8%+16.1%12.5%26.9%+0.3 pts−0.9 pts
3 years+53.2%not published37.2%not published−41.4 ptsnot published
Since launch+194.6%+45.1%116.0%59.3%−632.3 pts−7.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLD and XDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 14, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerGlobal XRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized12.0%17.7%
Expense ratio0.60%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%26.9%
Price change, 1 year+8.0%−13.2%
Total return, 1 year+21.8%+16.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.5%+17.0%
Ahead or behind+0.3 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age4659 days921 days

QYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 14, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 14, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 14, 2026, XDTE paid 26.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 14, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.7%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QYLD or XDTE?
Over the year to Sep 14, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 26.9%, so XDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLD or XDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, QYLD returned +21.8% and XDTE returned +16.1% over the year to Sep 14, 2026, so QYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, QYLD or XDTE?
QYLD charges 0.60% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLD against XDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 14, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLD against XDTE, data as of Sep 14, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qyld-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources