Data as of .
GPIQ vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XDTE paid 26.9% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 11.1%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GPIQ | Only in XDTE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.48% | SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 67.54% |
| APPLE INC 6.59% | SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 25.09% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.36% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.20% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.96% | |
| ALPHABET INC 3.54% | |
| TESLA INC 3.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | XDTE | GPIQ | XDTE | GPIQ | XDTE | |
| 3 months | −0.4% | +3.9% | 2.6% | 5.1% | +0.4 pts | +0.6 pts |
| 6 months | +17.3% | +13.4% | 5.8% | 10.5% | −3.4 pts | −2.6 pts |
| 1 year | +21.9% | +16.6% | 11.1% | 26.9% | −1.1 pts | −0.9 pts |
| Since launch | +96.4% | +45.7% | 38.2% | 59.3% | −15.0 pts | −7.2 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Roundhill |
| Strategy | covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.6% | 17.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.1% | 26.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.8% | −12.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.9% | +16.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.0% | +17.5% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.1 pts | −0.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1051 days | 918 days |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.
XDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XDTE paid 26.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.6%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIQ or XDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.1% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 26.9%, so XDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or XDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +21.9% and XDTE returned +16.6% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, GPIQ or XDTE?
- GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against XDTE, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.