Data as of .
GPIQ vs IVVW: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year IVVW paid 17.5% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 11.0%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and IVVW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GPIQ | Only in IVVW |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.48% | ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 101.45% |
| APPLE INC 6.59% | USD CASH 0.18% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62% | OCT26 SPX C @ 7625.000000 -1.63% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.20% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.96% | |
| ALPHABET INC 3.54% | |
| TESLA INC 3.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | IVVW | GPIQ | IVVW | GPIQ | IVVW | |
| 3 months | −1.7% | +4.6% | 2.5% | 2.6% | +0.8 pts | +2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +20.5% | +13.1% | 5.9% | 7.9% | −3.7 pts | −4.9 pts |
| 1 year | +21.4% | +17.2% | 11.0% | 17.5% | −0.4 pts | +0.6 pts |
| Since launch | +98.3% | +38.9% | 38.2% | 39.7% | −15.0 pts | −14.9 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.5% | 7.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.25% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.0% | 17.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.3% | −2.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.4% | +17.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | +0.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1058 days | 917 days |
| Net assets | $5.8bn | $350m |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.
IVVW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.6%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIQ or IVVW?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting price in cash and IVVW paid 17.5%, so IVVW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or IVVW?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +21.4% and IVVW returned +17.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, GPIQ or IVVW?
- GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and IVVW charges 0.25%, so IVVW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against IVVW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-ivvw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.