Data as of .
IVVW vs JEPI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year IVVW paid 17.5% of its price in cash against JEPI’s 8.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: IVVW scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IVVW and JEPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IVVW | Only in JEPI |
|---|---|
| ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 101.45% | AbbVie, Inc. 1.74% |
| USD CASH 0.18% | Howmet Aerospace, Inc. 1.70% |
| OCT26 SPX C @ 7625.000000 -1.63% | Johnson & Johnson 1.68% |
| Eaton Corp. plc 1.64% | |
| Trane Technologies plc 1.62% | |
| Lam Research Corp. 1.57% | |
| Apple, Inc. 1.53% | |
| NVIDIA Corp. 1.53% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVVW | JEPI | IVVW | JEPI | IVVW | JEPI | |
| 3 months | +4.6% | +2.3% | 2.6% | 2.0% | +2.4 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 6 months | +13.1% | +4.6% | 7.9% | 4.3% | −4.9 pts | −13.5 pts |
| 1 year | +17.2% | +7.0% | 17.5% | 8.1% | +0.6 pts | −9.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +29.4% | not published | 24.6% | not published | −49.0 pts |
| Since launch | +38.9% | +92.6% | 39.7% | 60.9% | −14.9 pts | −89.9 pts |
| IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 7.6% | 7.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 17.5% | 8.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −2.0% | −1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +7.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.6 pts | −9.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 917 days | 2311 days |
| Net assets | $350m | $45.3bn |
IVVW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.6%, paid monthly.
JEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JEPI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.9%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, IVVW or JEPI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting price in cash and JEPI paid 8.1%, so IVVW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, IVVW or JEPI?
- With every distribution reinvested, IVVW returned +17.2% and JEPI returned +7.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so IVVW returned more.
- Which is cheaper, IVVW or JEPI?
- IVVW charges 0.25% a year and JEPI charges 0.35%, so IVVW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVVW against JEPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ivvw-vs-jepi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.