Data as of .
JANJ vs JEPI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year JEPI paid 8.1% of its price in cash against JANJ’s 5.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JEPI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JANJ and JEPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in JANJ | Only in JEPI |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 97.55% | AbbVie, Inc. 1.74% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.23% | Howmet Aerospace, Inc. 1.70% |
| TREASURY BILL 1.22% | Johnson & Johnson 1.68% |
| Eaton Corp. plc 1.64% | |
| Trane Technologies plc 1.62% | |
| Lam Research Corp. 1.57% | |
| Apple, Inc. 1.53% | |
| NVIDIA Corp. 1.53% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JANJ | JEPI | JANJ | JEPI | JANJ | JEPI | |
| 3 months | +1.3% | +2.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | −0.9 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 6 months | +5.0% | +4.6% | 2.5% | 4.3% | −13.0 pts | −13.5 pts |
| 1 year | +5.1% | +7.0% | 5.0% | 8.1% | −11.4 pts | −9.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +29.4% | not published | 24.6% | not published | −49.0 pts |
| Since launch | +15.9% | +92.6% | 13.2% | 60.9% | −50.5 pts | −89.9 pts |
| JANJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | defined income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 5.0% | 7.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.0% | 8.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | 0.0% | −1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.1% | +7.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −11.4 pts | −9.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 990 days | 2311 days |
| Net assets | $14m | $45.3bn |
JANJ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANJ paid 5.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid quarterly.
JEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JEPI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.9%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JANJ or JEPI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANJ paid 5.0% of its starting price in cash and JEPI paid 8.1%, so JEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANJ or JEPI?
- With every distribution reinvested, JANJ returned +5.1% and JEPI returned +7.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JEPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JANJ or JEPI?
- JANJ charges 0.79% a year and JEPI charges 0.35%, so JEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JANJ against JEPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janj-vs-jepi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.