Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

DUBS vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DUBS and QYLD

Net assets: $398m on Jul 31, 2026 for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF, and $8.5bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
2.3%
DUBS cash paid, 1 year
12.3%
QYLD cash paid, 1 year
+18.6%
DUBS total return, 1 year
+16.5%
QYLD total return, 1 year
DUBS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.8 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS
+18.6%
SPY
+14.8%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

2.3% cash

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

2.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLD
+16.5%
QQQ
+12.3%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

12.3% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLD

+16.5%

12.3% cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

12.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +18.6%. QYLD over 1 year: paid 12.3%, price +3.3%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +18.6%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DUBS costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DUBS vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDUBSQYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+18.6%+16.5%
Price change, 1 yearrose 16.0%rose 3.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate71% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment99% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.60%
Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and QYLD as of Oct 12, 2026$398m$8.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · DUBS scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score97.9DUBS72.8QYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Jun 23, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 175 weekly returns
DUBS QYLD
Return
Total return edge DUBS +83.8% +53.5%
Annualized edge DUBS +19.8% +13.6%
Price return edge DUBS +70.2% +2.3%
Risk
Volatility edge QYLD 13.5% 11.6%
Max drawdown edge DUBS (slight) −16.4% −17.5%
Downside capture 95.8% 64.8%
Beta 0.96 0.55
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DUBS 1.07 0.77
Sortino edge DUBS 1.65 1.10
Treynor 0.151 0.127
Calmar edge DUBS 1.21 0.78
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.9% a year −2.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.98 −1.37
Information ratio 0.16 −0.93
Tracking error 1.8% 10.6%

Each against its own benchmark: DUBS against SPY, Jun 23, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026; QYLD against QQQ, Dec 20, 2013 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Jun 2023 to Oct 2026, DUBS returned more: +83.8% to +53.5%. QYLD swung less: 11.6% to 13.5%. DUBS fell slightly less at its worst: −16.4% to −17.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DUBS vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDUBSQYLDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+83.8%+53.5%DUBSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.8%+13.6%DUBSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+70.2%+2.3%DUBSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility13.5%11.6%QYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.8%8.1%QYLD (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−16.4%−17.5%DUBS (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture95.7%37.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.8%64.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.960.55Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.980.77Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.070.77DUBSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.651.10DUBSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1510.127Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.210.78DUBSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.9% a year−2.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.98−1.37Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.9% to +2.8%−5.5% to +1.0%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.16−0.93Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.8%10.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 175 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and QYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DUBS QYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DUBS
State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 73.21%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 24.71%
Only in QYLD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.20%
APPLE INC. 7.65%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.82%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.93%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.32%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.62%
ALPHABET INC. 3.50%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF · Option income on SPY, paying quarterly QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 2.2% 12.2%
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 2.3% 12.3%
Price change, 1 year +16.0% +3.3%
Total return, 1 year +18.6% +16.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind +3.8 pts +4.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 71% 99%
Age 3.4 years 12.9 years
Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and QYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $398m $8.5bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DUBS vs QYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowDUBSQYLDDUBSQYLDDUBSQYLD
3 months+0.6%+2.4%0.6%3.0%+0.7 pts+5.9 pts
6 months+6.7%+5.4%1.1%6.0%+1.7 pts+5.8 pts
1 year+18.6%+16.5%2.3%12.3%+3.8 pts+4.2 pts
3 years+85.1%+52.7%9.9%37.9%+2.2 pts−38.6 pts
Since launchNot the same days: DUBS Jun 2023 · QYLD Dec 2013+86.4%+194.8%10.2%117.5%+3.2 pts−610.5 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DUBS

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.2%, paid quarterly. Aptus estimates that 71% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QYLD

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or QYLD?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.3%, so QYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or QYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +18.6% and QYLD +16.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or QYLD?
DUBS charges 0.40% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUBS against QYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-qyld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.