Which paid more, QXQ or SCLZ?

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QXQ paid 15.1% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.4%, so QXQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, QXQ or SCLZ?

With every distribution reinvested, QXQ returned +12.1% and SCLZ +9.8% over the year to Nov 12, 2026.

Which is cheaper, QXQ or SCLZ?

QXQ charges 0.98% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share on X Download as PDF

QXQ vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap

+2.3 pts

1 year to Nov 12, 2026: QXQ ahead, total return

Fee gap

0.19 pts

A year: QXQ 0.98%, SCLZ 0.79%, per filings dated Jan 5, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026

Overlap

–

No book read for both funds

Net flow

–

Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

SCLZ costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QXQ vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	QXQ	SCLZ
Paid and earned
Measure	QXQ	SCLZ
Total return, 1 year	+12.1%	+9.8%
Price change, 1 year	fell 4.7%	rose 0.9%
Against its benchmark
Measure	QXQ	SCLZ
Benchmark	Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	QXQ	SCLZ
Expense ratio	0.98%	0.79%
Net assets, QXQ as of Aug 31, 2026 and SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026	$82m	$20m
Holdings
Measure	QXQ	SCLZ
Holdings in common	not published

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · SCLZ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score52QXQ72.2SCLZ

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 171 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

QXQ 52

SCLZ 72.2

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Key numbers

15.1%

QXQ cash paid, 1 year

8.4%

SCLZ cash paid, 1 year

+12.1%

QXQ total return, 1 year

+9.8%

SCLZ total return, 1 year

QXQ · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

QXQ

+12.1%

QQQ

+11.3%

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

QXQ over 1 year: paid 15.1%, price −4.7%, total +12.1%, QQQ +11.3%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QXQ

+12.1%

15.1% of it arrived as cash

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

QXQ over 1 year: paid 15.1%, price −4.7%, total +12.1%, QQQ +11.3%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QXQ

+12.1%

15.1% as cash

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

15.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QXQ over 1 year: paid 15.1%, price −4.7%, total +12.1%, QQQ +11.3%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SCLZ · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 2.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ

+9.8%

SPY

+12.0%

2.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.9%, total +9.8%, SPY +12.0%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

SCLZ

+9.8%

8.4% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.9%, total +9.8%, SPY +12.0%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

SCLZ

+9.8%

8.4% as cash

2.2 pts behind SPY

8.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.4%, price +0.9%, total +9.8%, SPY +12.0%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying quarterly SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly

Issuer SGI Swan

Strategy covered call dividend stocks with call overlay

Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays quarterly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 1.0% 8.7%

Expense ratio 0.98% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 15.1% 8.4%

Price change, 1 year −4.7% +0.9%

Total return, 1 year +12.1% +9.8%

Benchmark return, 1 year +11.3% +12.0%

Ahead or behind +0.8 pts −2.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 2.4 years 2.7 years

Net assets, QXQ as of Aug 31, 2026 and SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026 $82m $20m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QXQ vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	QXQ	SCLZ	QXQ	SCLZ	QXQ	SCLZ
3 months	−5.4%	−0.2%	0.2%	2.1%	+0.5 pts	+2.2 pts
6 months	−3.8%	+3.7%	0.5%	4.3%	+0.4 pts	+2.0 pts
1 year	+12.1%	+9.8%	15.1%	8.4%	+0.8 pts	−2.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QXQ Jun 2024 · SCLZ Feb 2024	+47.7%	+35.9%	22.8%	21.2%	+2.2 pts	−18.3 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

QXQ

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QXQ paid 15.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 1.0%, paid quarterly.

SCLZ

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QXQ or SCLZ?: Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QXQ paid 15.1% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.4%, so QXQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QXQ or SCLZ?: With every distribution reinvested, QXQ returned +12.1% and SCLZ +9.8% over the year to Nov 12, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QXQ or SCLZ?: QXQ charges 0.98% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

QXQ vs DRKY QXQ vs APRH QXQ vs APRJ QXQ vs BIGY SCLZ vs BALQ SCLZ vs ACQQ SCLZ vs QYLG SCLZ vs TDAQ

Where to next

Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →S&P 500 (SPY) →QXQ on its own →SCLZ on its own →QXQ dividend history →SCLZ dividend history →SCLZ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

QXQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QXQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

SGI website ↗

SCLZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SCLZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Swan website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QXQ against SCLZ, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qxq-vs-sclz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

Net assets: $82m on Aug 31, 2026 for SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF, and $20m on Jun 30, 2026 for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF.

QXQ on its own →SCLZ on its own →

Growth of 100

QXQ and SCLZ

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 year.

QXQ +12.1%SCLZ +9.8%

Nov 12, 2025Nov 12, 2026

QXQ +12.1%, SCLZ +9.8%: QXQ +2.3 pts ahead, 1 year, Nov 12, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026.