Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QUSA vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XDTE paid 26.5% of its price in cash against QUSA’s 13.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
26.5%XDTE cash paid, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year
+15.6%XDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QUSA 21.4XDTE 41.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% as cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL
XDTE1 pt behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XDTE+15.6%26.5% of it arrived as cash1 pt behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XDTE+15.6%26.5% as cash1 pt behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUSA and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QUSAOnly in XDTE
Microsoft Corp 6.08%SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 66.30%
Apple Inc 5.99%SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 24.62%
NVIDIA Corp 5.78%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.23%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%First American Government Obligations Fu 1.84%
Caterpillar Inc 4.91%
Broadcom Inc 4.70%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QUSA and XDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QUSAXDTEQUSAXDTEQUSAXDTE
3 months−1.9%+2.5%3.6%5.1%−3.6 pts+0.3 pts
6 months+10.4%+14.9%7.8%10.6%−4.3 pts−3.1 pts
1 year+3.5%+15.6%13.8%26.5%−11.7 pts−1.0 pts
Since launch+4.9%+45.9%15.1%59.5%−25.8 pts−6.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QUSA and XDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerVistaSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkUSA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized15.3%15.2%
Expense ratio0.97%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year13.8%26.5%
Price change, 1 year−11.0%−13.4%
Total return, 1 year+3.5%+15.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+15.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.7 pts−1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age500 days925 days
Net assets$22m$336m

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

XDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XDTE paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QUSA or XDTE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 26.5%, so XDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QUSA or XDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, QUSA returned +3.5% and XDTE returned +15.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QUSA or XDTE?
QUSA charges 0.97% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUSA against XDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against XDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources