Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
SCLZ vs XDTE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XDTE paid 25.5% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about SCLZ and XDTENet assets: $20m on Jun 30, 2026 for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF, and $321m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.
4.2 pts behind SPY
SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
SCLZ
+10.6%
8.5% of it arrived as cash
4.2 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.2 pts behind SPY
SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
SCLZ
+10.6%
8.5% cash
4.2 pts behind SPY
8.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.About even with SPY
XDTE over 1 year: paid 25.5%, price −13.2%, total +14.6%, SPY +14.8%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
XDTE
+14.6%
25.5% of it arrived as cash
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
XDTE over 1 year: paid 25.5%, price −13.2%, total +14.6%, SPY +14.8%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
XDTE
+14.6%
25.5% as cash
about even with SPY
25.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XDTE over 1 year: paid 25.5%, price −13.2%, total +14.6%, SPY +14.8%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
SCLZ costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.0 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | SCLZ | XDTE |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.6% | +14.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 1.6% | fell 13.2% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.97% |
| Net assets, SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and XDTE as of Nov 4, 2026 | $20m | $321m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, SCLZ and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SCLZ | XDTE | SCLZ | XDTE | SCLZ | XDTE |
| 3 months | 0.0% | +1.0% | 2.1% | 4.2% | +0.2 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +4.4% | +5.5% | 4.3% | 9.3% | −0.6 pts | +0.5 pts |
| 1 year | +10.6% | +14.6% | 8.5% | 25.5% | −4.2 pts | −0.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: SCLZ Feb 2024 · XDTE Mar 2024 | +35.4% | +47.4% | 21.2% | 60.8% | −20.8 pts | −6.4 pts |
SCLZ
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.7%, paid monthly.
XDTE
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XDTE paid 25.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCLZ against XDTE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-xdte
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). SCLZ against XDTE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-xdte
[SCLZ against XDTE (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-xdte)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.