Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DUBS vs SCLZ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year SCLZ paid 8.4% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF and Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF.

2.3%DUBS cash paid, 1 year
8.4%SCLZ cash paid, 1 year
+20.3%DUBS total return, 1 year
+13.2%SCLZ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DUBS scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DUBS 94SCLZ 43.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DUBS3.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPY
SCLZ14 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%SCLZ+13.2%8.4% of it arrived as cash14 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%SCLZ+13.2%14 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and SCLZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DUBSOnly in SCLZ
State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 74.61%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.89%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 25.28%APPLE INC 6.15%
TREASURY BILL 0.11%NVIDIA CORP 5.99%
ALPHABET INC 5.18%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14%
BROADCOM INC 4.71%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DUBS and SCLZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DUBSSCLZDUBSSCLZDUBSSCLZ
3 months+3.2%+2.9%0.5%2.1%+1.0 pts−3.6 pts
6 months+20.3%+14.2%1.2%3.8%+2.3 pts+1.6 pts
1 year+20.3%+13.2%2.3%8.4%+3.7 pts−14.0 pts
3 years+80.1%not published9.1%not published+1.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+84.4%+36.5%9.3%19.6%+2.4 pts−6.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DUBS and SCLZ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
Option income on SPY, paying quarterly
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerAptusSwan
Strategyoption incomedividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized2.1%8.5%
Expense ratio0.40%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year2.3%8.4%
Price change, 1 year+17.6%+4.1%
Total return, 1 year+20.3%+13.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+27.2%
Ahead or behind+3.7 pts−14.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1192 days934 days
Net assets$353m$20m

DUBS in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.1%, paid quarterly.

SCLZ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or SCLZ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.4%, so SCLZ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or SCLZ?
With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +20.3% and SCLZ returned +13.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DUBS returned more.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or SCLZ?
DUBS charges 0.40% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DUBS against SCLZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DUBS against SCLZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-sclz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources