Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QUSA vs WDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year WDTE paid 28.0% of its price in cash against QUSA’s 13.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF and Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF.

13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
28.0%WDTE cash paid, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year
+15.8%WDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: WDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QUSA 21.4WDTE 413.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% as cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL
WDTE0.8 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%WDTE+15.8%28.0% of it arrived as cash0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%WDTE+15.8%28.0% as cash0.8 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUSA and WDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QUSAOnly in WDTE
Microsoft Corp 6.08%Spx Us 12/18/26 C600 92.83%
Apple Inc 5.99%First American Government Obligations Fu 6.61%
NVIDIA Corp 5.78%Cash & Other 0.69%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%Spx 09/21/2026 7674.22 C 0.11%
Caterpillar Inc 4.91%Spx 09/21/2026 7650.5 C -0.24%
Broadcom Inc 4.70%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QUSA and WDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QUSAWDTEQUSAWDTEQUSAWDTE
3 months−1.9%+3.2%3.6%7.4%−3.6 pts+0.9 pts
6 months+10.4%+17.3%7.8%15.7%−4.3 pts−0.7 pts
1 year+3.5%+15.8%13.8%28.0%−11.7 pts−0.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+49.2%not published77.8%not published−29.2 pts
Since launch+4.9%+49.2%15.1%77.8%−25.8 pts−29.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QUSA and WDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerVistaSharesDefiance
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkUSA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized15.3%29.9%
Expense ratio0.97%1.03%
Cash paid, 1 year13.8%28.0%
Price change, 1 year−11.0%−14.8%
Total return, 1 year+3.5%+15.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+15.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.7 pts−0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published38%
Age500 days1095 days
Net assets$22m$71m

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

WDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, WDTE paid 28.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 38% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QUSA or WDTE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting price in cash and WDTE paid 28.0%, so WDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QUSA or WDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, QUSA returned +3.5% and WDTE returned +15.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so WDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QUSA or WDTE?
QUSA charges 0.97% a year and WDTE charges 1.03%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUSA against WDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against WDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-wdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources