Data as of .
ACSP vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and QUSA both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and QUSA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in QUSA |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF 100.00% | Microsoft Corp 6.08% |
| Apple Inc 5.99% | |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.78% | |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35% | |
| Caterpillar Inc 4.91% | |
| Broadcom Inc 4.70% | |
| Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40% | |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | QUSA | ACSP | QUSA | ACSP | QUSA | |
| 3 months | not published | −1.9% | not published | 3.6% | not published | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +10.4% | not published | 7.8% | not published | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +3.5% | not published | 13.8% | not published | −11.7 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +4.9% | 0.0% | 15.1% | −2.1 pts | −25.8 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 13.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | −11.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +3.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +15.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −11.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 500 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $22m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or QUSA?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.