Data as of .
DIVO vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QUSA paid 13.8% of its price in cash against DIVO’s 6.8%, though DIVO returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DIVO scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and QUSA hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DIVO | QUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp | 5.97% | 6.08% |
| Apple Inc | 5.49% | 5.99% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 5.34% | 4.91% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 3.97% | 5.78% |
| Visa Inc | 5.15% | 3.37% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.15% | 2.22% |
| Walmart Inc | 1.96% | 4.17% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 1.95% | 4.33% |
| Merck & Co Inc | 3.51% | 1.41% |
| Only in DIVO | Only in QUSA |
|---|---|
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 5.02% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.90% | Broadcom Inc 4.70% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 4.76% | Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40% |
| Amgen Inc 4.74% | Meta Platforms Inc 4.28% |
| Chevron Corp 4.67% | Eli Lilly & Co 4.24% |
| State Street Consumer Discretionary Sele 4.53% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.85% |
| Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF 4.17% | Netflix Inc 3.79% |
| American Express Co 4.01% | Lam Research Corp 3.47% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVO | QUSA | DIVO | QUSA | DIVO | QUSA | |
| 3 months | +4.5% | −1.9% | 1.2% | 3.6% | +2.3 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +9.4% | +10.4% | 2.5% | 7.8% | −8.6 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | +14.6% | +3.5% | 6.8% | 13.8% | −2.0 pts | −11.7 pts |
| 3 years | +56.1% | not published | 19.1% | not published | −22.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +218.8% | +4.9% | 72.4% | 15.1% | −76.3 pts | −25.8 pts |
| DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly | QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | VistaShares |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.9% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.8% | 13.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.3% | −11.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.6% | +3.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +15.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.0 pts | −11.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 3565 days | 500 days |
| Net assets | $7.8bn | $22m |
DIVO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.9%, paid monthly.
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DIVO or QUSA?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 13.8%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or QUSA?
- With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +14.6% and QUSA returned +3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DIVO returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DIVO or QUSA?
- DIVO charges 0.56% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/divo-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.