Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

QQQI vs YLDE: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQI paid 13.9% of its price in cash against YLDE’s 7.9%, though YLDE returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQI and YLDE

Net assets: $15.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF, and $186m on Nov 3, 2026 for Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF.

At a glance
13.9%
QQQI cash paid, 1 year
7.9%
YLDE cash paid, 1 year
+8.9%
QQQI total return, 1 year
+19.0%
YLDE total return, 1 year
QQQI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.4 pts behind QQQ
QQQI
+8.9%
QQQ
+12.3%

3.4 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QQQI

+8.9%

13.9% of it arrived as cash

3.4 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.4 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QQQI

+8.9%

3.4 pts behind QQQ

13.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
YLDE · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of IWV
YLDE
+19.0%
IWV
+14.8%

4.2 pts ahead of IWV

YLDE over 1 year: paid 7.9%, price +10.5%, total +19.0%, IWV +14.8%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWV

+14.8%

YLDE

+19.0%

7.9% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of IWV

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of IWV

YLDE over 1 year: paid 7.9%, price +10.5%, total +19.0%, IWV +14.8%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWV

+14.8%

YLDE

+19.0%

4.2 pts ahead of IWV

7.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. YLDE over 1 year: paid 7.9%, price +10.5%, total +19.0%, IWV +14.8%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

YLDE costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.1 points; QQQI is far larger, $15.5bn against $181m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QQQI vs YLDE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQQQIYLDE
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+8.9%+19.0%
Price change, 1 yearfell 5.4%rose 10.5%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment67% of the Apr 6, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQiShares Russell 3000 ETF, measured through IWV
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.68%0.48%
Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026$15.5bn$181m
Holdings
Holdings in common19%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · YLDE scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score42.2QQQI91.9YLDE

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 142 weekly returns
QQQI YLDE
Return
Total return edge QQQI (slight) +50.0% +45.0%
Annualized edge QQQI (slight) +16.0% +14.6%
Price return edge YLDE +1.4% +27.3%
Risk
Volatility edge YLDE 16.0% 10.5%
Max drawdown edge YLDE −18.4% −9.9%
Downside capture 85.5% 75.6%
Beta 0.80 0.76
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge YLDE 0.74 0.93
Sortino edge YLDE 1.09 1.38
Treynor 0.148 0.128
Calmar edge YLDE 0.87 1.47
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.1% a year +0.7% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.05 0.29
Information ratio −0.66 −0.27
Tracking error 4.8% 8.3%

Each against its own benchmark: QQQI against QQQ, Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026; YLDE against IWV, Jun 2, 2017 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Feb 2024 to Oct 2026, QQQI returned slightly more: +50.0% to +45.0%. YLDE swung less: 10.5% to 16.0%. YLDE fell less at its worst: −9.9% to −18.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: QQQI vs YLDE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQQQIYLDEEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+50.0%+45.0%QQQI (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.0%+14.6%QQQI (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1.4%+27.3%YLDEPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.0%10.5%YLDESpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.8%7.2%YLDELike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.4%−9.9%YLDEDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture69.5%61.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture85.5%75.6%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.800.76Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.980.79Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.740.93YLDEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.091.38YLDEReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1480.128Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.871.47YLDEAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQIWVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.1% a year+0.7% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.050.29Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.1% to +2.9%−3.9% to +5.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.66−0.27Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error4.8%8.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 142 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

19%

By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and YLDE hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

19% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQI YLDE
NVIDIA Corp 8.08% 2.97%
Alphabet Inc 2.66% 3.52%
Microsoft Corp 6.31% 2.61%
Broadcom Inc 2.57% 2.21%
Apple Inc 7.88% 1.86%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.00% 1.59%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.28% 2.23%
Linde PLC 1.06% 1.53%
T-Mobile US Inc 0.75% 1.63%
Automatic Data Processing Inc 0.53% 2.00%
Comcast Corp 0.38% 2.19%
Honeywell International Inc 0.32% 0.61%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QQQI
Amazon.com Inc 4.40%
Micron Technology Inc 4.34%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.56%
Tesla Inc 3.42%
Walmart Inc 2.74%
Alphabet Inc 2.48%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.26%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.02%
Only in YLDE
WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE) 4.53%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.96%
NESTLE' SA/AG 2.88%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC 2.77%
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 2.72%
UNILEVER PLC 2.58%
PUBLIC STORAGE 2.53%
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC 2.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying monthly YLDE Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF · Covered call on IWV, paying monthly
Issuer NEOS Franklin
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 14.7% 6.3%
Expense ratio 0.68% 0.48%
Cash paid, 1 year 13.9% 7.9%
Price change, 1 year −5.4% +10.5%
Total return, 1 year +8.9% +19.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −3.4 pts +4.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 67%
Age 2.8 years 9.5 years
Net assets, QQQI as of Oct 28, 2026 and YLDE as of Nov 3, 2026 $15.5bn $186m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QQQI vs YLDE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowQQQIYLDEQQQIYLDEQQQIYLDE
3 months−2.2%+3.2%3.5%1.6%+1.3 pts+3.6 pts
6 months−0.2%+8.6%6.9%4.0%+0.1 pts+3.7 pts
1 year+8.9%+19.0%13.9%7.9%−3.4 pts+4.2 pts
3 years–+61.5%–18.0%–−19.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QQQI Jan 2024 · YLDE May 2017+53.8%+197.5%41.2%44.5%−11.2 pts−52.9 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 126 days apart.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QQQI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQI paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.7%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

YLDE

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YLDE paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.0%. iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly. Franklin estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Apr 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QQQI or YLDE?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQI paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and YLDE paid 7.9%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or YLDE?
With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +8.9% and YLDE +19.0% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or YLDE?
QQQI charges 0.68% a year and YLDE charges 0.48%, so YLDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQI against YLDE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-ylde

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.