Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

APLY vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, APLY paid 28.6% of its price in cash against QQQI’s 13.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about APLY and QQQI

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $112m for YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF and $15.4bn for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF.

At a glance
28.6%
APLY cash paid, 1 year
13.7%
QQQI cash paid, 1 year
+18.2%
APLY total return, 1 year
+11.9%
QQQI total return, 1 year
APLY · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 10.1 pts behind AAPL
APLY
+18.2%
AAPL
+28.3%

10.1 pts behind AAPL

APLY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −14.2%, total +18.2%, AAPL +28.3%, −10.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

AAPL

+28.3%

APLY

+18.2%

28.6% of it arrived as cash

10.1 pts behind AAPL

Total return, distributions reinvested

10.1 pts behind AAPL

APLY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −14.2%, total +18.2%, AAPL +28.3%, −10.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

AAPL

+28.3%

APLY

+18.2%

28.6% cash

10.1 pts behind AAPL

28.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. APLY over 1 year: paid 28.6%, price −14.2%, total +18.2%, AAPL +28.3%, −10.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
QQQI · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 3.3 pts behind QQQ
QQQI
+11.9%
QQQ
+15.2%

3.3 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.7%, price −2.8%, total +11.9%, QQQ +15.2%, −3.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

QQQI

+11.9%

13.7% of it arrived as cash

3.3 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.3 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.7%, price −2.8%, total +11.9%, QQQ +15.2%, −3.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

QQQ

+15.2%

QQQI

+11.9%

3.3 pts behind QQQ

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.7%, price −2.8%, total +11.9%, QQQ +15.2%, −3.3 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QQQI costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points; QQQI is far larger, $15.4bn against $112m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

APLY vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureAPLYQQQI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+18.2%+11.9%
Price change, 1 yearfell 14.2%fell 2.8%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkApple (AAPL)Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.04%0.68%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$112m$15.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · APLY scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

APLY among the 74 income ETFs writing on a single company

IQ Income Score84.5APLY49.1QQQI

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 74 income ETFs writing on a single company and 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

APLY 84.5
0.7, the lowest in this set 99.3, the highest

QQQI among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company

QQQI 49.1
0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

A percentile among the 74 income ETFs writing on a single company. QQQI is a percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 141 weekly returns
APLY QQQI
Return
Total return edge QQQI (slight) +48.5% +52.7%
Annualized edge QQQI (slight) +15.7% +16.9%
Price return edge QQQI −35.3% +3.2%
Risk
Volatility edge QQQI 21.9% 16.0%
Max drawdown edge QQQI −24.1% −18.4%
Downside capture 91.8% 85.4%
Beta 0.78 0.79
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQI 0.58 0.79
Sortino edge QQQI 0.79 1.16
Treynor 0.145 0.158
Calmar edge QQQI 0.65 0.92
Against the benchmark
Alpha −4.1% a year 0.0% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.45 0.01
Information ratio −1.09 −0.67
Tracking error 7.8% 4.8%

Each against its own benchmark: APLY against AAPL, Apr 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026; QQQI against QQQ, Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

QQQI returned slightly more: +52.7% to +48.5%. QQQI swung less: 16.0% to 21.9%. QQQI fell less at its worst: −18.4% to −24.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: APLY vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureAPLYQQQIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+48.5%+52.7%QQQI (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.7%+16.9%QQQI (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return−35.3%+3.2%QQQIPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.9%16.0%QQQISpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.0%10.8%QQQILike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.1%−18.4%QQQIDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture66.1%69.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture91.8%85.4%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.780.79Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.940.98Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.79QQQIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.791.16QQQIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1450.158Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.650.92QQQIAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAAPLQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−4.1% a year0.0% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.450.01Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−9.7% to +1.5%−3.0% to +3.0%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−1.09−0.67Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.8%4.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 141 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, APLY and QQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first APLY QQQI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in APLY
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 26.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 13.93%
AAPL 12/18/2026 310.01 C 11.68%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C352.5 0.03%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C355 0.02%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C350 -0.12%
AAPL US 10/30/26 C347.5 -0.13%
AAPL 12/18/2026 310.01 P -0.86%
Only in QQQI
NVIDIA Corp 7.99%
Apple Inc 7.74%
Microsoft Corp 6.10%
Micron Technology Inc 4.73%
Amazon.com Inc 4.24%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.04%
Tesla Inc 3.29%
Alphabet Inc 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF · Synthetic covered call on AAPL, paying weekly QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
Issuer YieldMax NEOS
Strategy synthetic covered call option income
Benchmark Apple (AAPL) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 20.9% 14.1%
Expense ratio 1.04% 0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year 28.6% 13.7%
Price change, 1 year −14.2% −2.8%
Total return, 1 year +18.2% +11.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year +28.3% +15.2%
Ahead or behind −10.1 pts −3.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%
Age 3.5 years 2.7 years
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $112m $15.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: APLY vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowAPLYQQQIAPLYQQQIAPLYQQQI
3 months0.0%+9.9%6.7%3.8%−1.8 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+18.3%+7.8%17.5%7.2%−9.2 pts−2.1 pts
1 year+18.2%+11.9%28.6%13.7%−10.1 pts−3.3 pts
3 years+63.0%–73.1%–−44.1 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: APLY Apr 2023 · QQQI Jan 2024+62.0%+60.7%76.2%41.2%−47.9 pts−12.4 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-86A855A7AD

APLY and QQQI are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Income paid. APLY paid 28.6% and QQQI 13.7% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 14.9 points.
  2. What each is measured against. APLY is measured against Apple (AAPL) and QQQI against Nasdaq-100 through QQQ.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

APLY and QQQI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
APLY

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, APLY paid 28.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.2%. Apple (AAPL) returned +28.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.9%, paid weekly.

QQQI

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, QQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.3 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APLY or QQQI?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, APLY paid 28.6% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 13.7%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or QQQI?
With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +18.2% and QQQI +11.9% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, APLY or QQQI?
APLY charges 1.04% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, APLY against QQQI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aply-vs-qqqi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.