Data as of .
DOGG vs QQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QQQI paid 15.2% of its price in cash against DOGG’s 9.6%, though DOGG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DOGG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and QQQI hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DOGG | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Amgen Inc. | 6.33% | 0.92% |
| Only in DOGG | Only in QQQI |
|---|---|
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94% | NVIDIA Corp 8.58% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. 7.18% | Apple Inc 7.79% |
| The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47% | Microsoft Corp 5.84% |
| Chevron Corporation 5.81% | Micron Technology Inc 5.03% |
| Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55% | Amazon.com Inc 4.36% |
| The Coca-Cola Company 5.47% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.02% |
| McDonald's Corporation 4.92% | Alphabet Inc 3.24% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. 4.78% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.14% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGG | QQQI | DOGG | QQQI | DOGG | QQQI | |
| 3 months | +2.5% | −0.7% | 2.3% | 3.4% | +2.1 pts | +1.8 pts |
| 6 months | +3.9% | +16.7% | 4.5% | 7.7% | −10.1 pts | −7.5 pts |
| 1 year | +18.1% | +16.4% | 9.6% | 15.2% | +4.6 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 3 years | +40.2% | not published | 28.0% | not published | −16.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +43.7% | +59.6% | 30.9% | 39.9% | −17.9 pts | −12.3 pts |
| DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | NEOS |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 14.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.68% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.6% | 15.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.1% | +16.4% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.6 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 98% |
| Age | 1240 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $87m | $14.8bn |
DOGG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DOGG or QQQI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 15.2%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DOGG or QQQI?
- With every distribution reinvested, DOGG returned +18.1% and QQQI returned +16.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DOGG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DOGG or QQQI?
- DOGG charges 0.75% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOGG against QQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-qqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.