Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

DJIA vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQI paid 13.9% of its price in cash against DJIA’s 10.1%, though DJIA returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DJIA and QQQI

Net assets: $191m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF, and $15.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF.

At a glance
10.1%
DJIA cash paid, 1 year
13.9%
QQQI cash paid, 1 year
+13.9%
DJIA total return, 1 year
+8.9%
QQQI total return, 1 year
DJIA · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1 pt behind DIA
DJIA
+13.9%
DIA
+14.9%

1 pt behind DIA

DJIA over 1 year: paid 10.1%, price +2.9%, total +13.9%, DIA +14.9%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DIA

+14.9%

DJIA

+13.9%

10.1% of it arrived as cash

1 pt behind DIA

Total return, distributions reinvested

1 pt behind DIA

DJIA over 1 year: paid 10.1%, price +2.9%, total +13.9%, DIA +14.9%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DIA

+14.9%

DJIA

+13.9%

10.1% as cash

1 pt behind DIA

10.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DJIA over 1 year: paid 10.1%, price +2.9%, total +13.9%, DIA +14.9%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.4 pts behind QQQ
QQQI
+8.9%
QQQ
+12.3%

3.4 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QQQI

+8.9%

13.9% of it arrived as cash

3.4 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.4 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QQQI

+8.9%

13.9% cash

3.4 pts behind QQQ

13.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DJIA costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; QQQI is far larger, $15.3bn against $191m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DJIA vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDJIAQQQI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.9%+8.9%
Price change, 1 yearrose 2.9%fell 5.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate70% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average, measured through DIANasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 1.0 ptsbehind by 3.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.60%0.68%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$191m$15.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common21%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · DJIA scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score74.6DJIA42.2QQQI

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 142 weekly returns
DJIA QQQI
Return
Total return edge QQQI +32.8% +50.0%
Annualized edge QQQI +10.9% +16.0%
Price return edge QQQI +0.4% +1.4%
Risk
Volatility edge DJIA 9.1% 16.0%
Max drawdown edge DJIA −10.8% −18.4%
Downside capture 63.6% 85.5%
Beta 0.60 0.80
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QQQI (slight) 0.71 0.74
Sortino edge QQQI (slight) 0.98 1.09
Treynor 0.065 0.148
Calmar edge DJIA 1.01 0.87
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.7% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.31 −0.05
Information ratio −0.50 −0.66
Tracking error 7.8% 4.8%

Each against its own benchmark: DJIA against DIA, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026; QQQI against QQQ, Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Feb 2024 to Oct 2026, QQQI returned more: +50.0% to +32.8%. DJIA swung less: 9.1% to 16.0%. DJIA fell less at its worst: −10.8% to −18.4%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DJIA vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDJIAQQQIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+32.8%+50.0%QQQIPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.9%+16.0%QQQITotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+0.4%+1.4%QQQIPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility9.1%16.0%DJIASpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.6%10.8%DJIALike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−10.8%−18.4%DJIADeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture47.8%69.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture63.6%85.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.600.80Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.740.98Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.710.74QQQI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.981.09QQQI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0650.148Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.010.87DJIAAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkDIAQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.7% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.31−0.05Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.4% to +3.9%−3.1% to +2.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.50−0.66Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.8%4.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 142 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

21%

By the books each fund has filed, DJIA and QQQI hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

21% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DJIA QQQI
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.33% 6.31%
APPLE INC. 3.54% 7.88%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.11% 4.40%
ALPHABET INC. 4.08% 2.66%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 2.30% 8.08%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.33% 1.85%
WALMART INC. 1.27% 2.74%
AMGEN INC. 4.42% 1.12%
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION 2.79% 0.32%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DJIA
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 11.67%
CATERPILLAR INC. 9.34%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 4.75%
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 4.29%
VISA INC. 4.20%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.03%
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY 3.91%
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY 3.85%
Only in QQQI
Micron Technology Inc 4.34%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.56%
Tesla Inc 3.42%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.00%
Broadcom Inc 2.57%
Alphabet Inc 2.48%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.26%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.02%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DJIA Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on DIA, paying monthly QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
Issuer Global X NEOS
Strategy covered call option income
Benchmark Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 8.2% 14.7%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.1% 13.9%
Price change, 1 year +2.9% −5.4%
Total return, 1 year +13.9% +8.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.9% +12.3%
Ahead or behind −1.0 pts −3.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 70% 100%
Age 4.7 years 2.8 years
Net assets, DJIA as of Oct 12, 2026 and QQQI as of Oct 28, 2026 $191m $15.5bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DJIA vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowDJIAQQQIDJIAQQQIDJIAQQQI
3 months+1.4%−2.2%1.7%3.5%+2.8 pts+1.3 pts
6 months+8.7%−0.2%3.7%6.9%+1.2 pts+0.1 pts
1 year+13.9%+8.9%10.1%13.9%−1.0 pts−3.4 pts
3 years+41.7%–30.4%–−22.4 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: DJIA Feb 2022 · QQQI Jan 2024+46.0%+53.8%40.8%41.2%−27.9 pts−11.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DJIA

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DJIA paid 10.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.9%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +14.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 70% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QQQI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQI paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.7%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DJIA or QQQI?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DJIA paid 10.1% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 13.9%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DJIA or QQQI?
With every distribution reinvested, DJIA returned +13.9% and QQQI +8.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DJIA or QQQI?
DJIA charges 0.60% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so DJIA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DJIA against QQQI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/djia-vs-qqqi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.