Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QQQI vs XDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XDTE paid 26.9% of its price in cash against QQQI’s 14.2% and the two finished level on total return.

NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

14.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
26.9%XDTE cash paid, 1 year
+16.9%QQQI total return, 1 year
+16.6%XDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QQQI 55XDTE 46.33.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QQQI6.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QQQI+16.9%14.2% of it arrived as cash6.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QQQI+16.9%14.2% cash6.1 pts behind QQQ
XDTE0.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
SPY+17.5%XDTE+16.6%26.9% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.5%XDTE+16.6%26.9% as cash0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQIOnly in XDTE
NVIDIA Corp 7.66%SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C 67.54%
Apple Inc 6.63%SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C 25.09%
Micron Technology Inc 5.61%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 7.36%
Microsoft Corp 4.38%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.12%
Amazon.com Inc 4.05%
Tesla Inc 3.35%
Alphabet Inc 3.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QQQI and XDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QQQIXDTEQQQIXDTEQQQIXDTE
3 months+0.7%+3.9%3.5%5.1%+1.4 pts+0.6 pts
6 months+13.7%+13.4%7.5%10.5%−7.0 pts−2.6 pts
1 year+16.9%+16.6%14.2%26.9%−6.1 pts−0.9 pts
Since launch+58.2%+45.7%38.6%59.3%−12.1 pts−7.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QQQI and XDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerNEOSRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized14.3%17.6%
Expense ratio0.68%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year14.2%26.9%
Price change, 1 year+1.5%−12.8%
Total return, 1 year+16.9%+16.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+17.5%
Ahead or behind−6.1 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate98%not published
Age955 days918 days

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QQQI paid 14.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, XDTE paid 26.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.6%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QQQI or XDTE?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QQQI paid 14.2% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 26.9%, so XDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or XDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +16.9% and XDTE returned +16.6% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or XDTE?
QQQI charges 0.68% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQI against XDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against XDTE, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-xdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources