Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QQQI vs QRMI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QQQI paid 15.2% of its price in cash against QRMI’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF.

15.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
11.8%QRMI cash paid, 1 year
+16.4%QQQI total return, 1 year
+8.5%QRMI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QQQI 50.5QRMI 28.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QQQI5.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% as cash5.3 pts behind QQQ
QRMI13.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%11.8% of it arrived as cash13.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%13.3 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and QRMI hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQI and QRMI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQIQRMI
NVIDIA Corp8.58%8.49%
Apple Inc7.79%7.78%
Microsoft Corp5.84%5.81%
Micron Technology Inc5.03%5.02%
Amazon.com Inc4.36%4.33%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.02%4.00%
Alphabet Inc3.24%3.25%
Meta Platforms Inc3.14%3.13%
Alphabet Inc2.99%3.01%
Tesla Inc2.91%3.03%
Broadcom Inc2.70%2.69%
Intel Corp2.44%2.49%
Only in each
Only in QQQIOnly in QRMI
NDX US 10/16/26 C30425 -0.17%CASH 1.06%
NDX US 10/16/26 C29975 -0.32%NDX US 10/16/26 P28000 0.47%
XND US 10/16/26 P280 0.00%
XND US 10/16/26 C294 -0.01%
OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -1.00%
NDX US 10/16/26 C29475 -2.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QQQI and QRMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QQQIQRMIQQQIQRMIQQQIQRMI
3 months−0.7%+0.6%3.4%3.0%+1.8 pts+3.1 pts
6 months+16.7%+7.3%7.7%6.1%−7.5 pts−17.0 pts
1 year+16.4%+8.5%15.2%11.8%−5.3 pts−13.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+26.7%not published33.5%not published−71.5 pts
Since launch+59.6%+10.4%39.9%40.8%−12.3 pts−89.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QQQI and QRMI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerNEOSGlobal X
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized14.0%12.0%
Expense ratio0.68%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year15.2%11.8%
Price change, 1 year−0.1%−3.8%
Total return, 1 year+16.4%+8.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−5.3 pts−13.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate98%100%
Age962 days1849 days
Net assets$14.8bn$15m

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

QRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QQQI or QRMI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting price in cash and QRMI paid 11.8%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or QRMI?
With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +16.4% and QRMI returned +8.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or QRMI?
QQQI charges 0.68% a year and QRMI charges 0.60%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQI against QRMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against QRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-qrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources