Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QQQI vs QQQY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QQQY paid 30.5% of its price in cash against QQQI’s 15.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF.

15.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
30.5%QQQY cash paid, 1 year
+16.4%QQQI total return, 1 year
+21.1%QQQY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QQQI 50.5QQQY 43.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QQQI5.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% as cash5.3 pts behind QQQ
QQQY0.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQY+21.1%30.5% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQY+21.1%30.5% as cash0.6 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and QQQY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QQQIOnly in QQQY
NVIDIA Corp 8.58%Ndx 12/18/2026 1000.34 C 98.70%
Apple Inc 7.79%Cash & Other 0.95%
Microsoft Corp 5.84%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.49%
Micron Technology Inc 5.03%Ndx 09/21/2026 29730.14 C 0.20%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%Ndx 09/21/2026 29644.17 C -0.34%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.02%
Alphabet Inc 3.24%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QQQI and QQQY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QQQIQQQYQQQIQQQYQQQIQQQY
3 months−0.7%−0.5%3.4%8.0%+1.8 pts+2.0 pts
6 months+16.7%+24.3%7.7%17.4%−7.5 pts+0.1 pts
1 year+16.4%+21.1%15.2%30.5%−5.3 pts−0.6 pts
3 yearsnot published+59.1%not published88.1%not published−39.0 pts
Since launch+59.6%+56.9%39.9%86.8%−12.3 pts−37.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QQQI and QQQY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerNEOSDefiance
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized14.0%29.5%
Expense ratio0.68%1.01%
Cash paid, 1 year15.2%30.5%
Price change, 1 year−0.1%−13.2%
Total return, 1 year+16.4%+21.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−5.3 pts−0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate98%69%
Age962 days1100 days
Net assets$14.8bn$188m

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

QQQY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQY paid 30.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.5%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 69% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QQQI or QQQY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting price in cash and QQQY paid 30.5%, so QQQY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or QQQY?
With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +16.4% and QQQY returned +21.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QQQY returned more.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or QQQY?
QQQI charges 0.68% a year and QQQY charges 1.01%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQI against QQQY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against QQQY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-qqqy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources