Data as of .
FTQI vs QRMI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year FTQI paid 12.0% of its price in cash against QRMI’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: FTQI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTQI and QRMI hold 53% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTQI | QRMI |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. | 8.76% | 7.78% |
| NVIDIA Corporation | 6.55% | 8.49% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 4.13% | 4.33% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 5.41% | 4.00% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) | 2.75% | 3.13% |
| Tesla, Inc. | 2.68% | 3.03% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 2.38% | 5.02% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | 2.06% | 3.25% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | 2.05% | 3.01% |
| Broadcom Inc. | 1.92% | 2.69% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3.18% | 1.89% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) | 2.54% | 1.78% |
| Only in FTQI | Only in QRMI |
|---|---|
| US Dollar 5.75% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.86% |
| AbbVie Inc. 1.32% | WALMART INC 2.27% |
| CME Group Inc. 0.97% | SANDISK CORP 1.15% |
| eBay Inc. 0.85% | CASH 1.06% |
| Caterpillar Inc. 0.82% | CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC - A 1.06% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. 0.79% | TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 1.06% |
| F5, Inc. 0.79% | MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 0.93% |
| Illumina, Inc. 0.76% | LINDE PLC 0.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTQI | QRMI | FTQI | QRMI | FTQI | QRMI | |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +0.6% | 2.9% | 3.0% | +6.5 pts | +3.1 pts |
| 6 months | +18.3% | +7.3% | 6.3% | 6.1% | −5.9 pts | −17.0 pts |
| 1 year | +21.5% | +8.5% | 12.0% | 11.8% | −0.3 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 3 years | +62.9% | +26.7% | 37.0% | 33.5% | −35.3 pts | −71.5 pts |
| Since launch | +141.7% | +10.4% | 78.8% | 40.8% | −675.0 pts | −89.1 pts |
| FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 11.9% | 12.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.0% | 11.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | −3.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.5% | +8.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.3 pts | −13.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 4637 days | 1849 days |
| Net assets | $975m | $15m |
FTQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTQI paid 12.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly.
QRMI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FTQI or QRMI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTQI paid 12.0% of its starting price in cash and QRMI paid 11.8%, so FTQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTQI or QRMI?
- With every distribution reinvested, FTQI returned +21.5% and QRMI returned +8.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FTQI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FTQI or QRMI?
- FTQI charges 0.75% a year and QRMI charges 0.60%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTQI against QRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ftqi-vs-qrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.