Data as of .
QDTY vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against XIJN’s 6.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XIJN scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTY and XIJN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTY | Only in XIJN |
|---|---|
| NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07 100.51% |
| XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.73 3.76% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53% | US Dollar 0.76% |
| United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56% |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTY | XIJN | QDTY | XIJN | QDTY | XIJN | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | +1.8% | 7.9% | 1.1% | +1.6 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +20.7% | +4.0% | 17.3% | 3.5% | −3.6 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | +20.2% | +6.2% | 30.9% | 6.9% | −1.6 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Since launch | +27.1% | +16.6% | 42.0% | 14.7% | −8.5 pts | −27.4 pts |
| QDTY YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | First Trust |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 25.9% | 6.7% |
| Expense ratio | 1.17% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 30.9% | 6.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −14.0% | −0.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +6.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.6 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 94% | not published |
| Age | 582 days | 816 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $53m |
QDTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XIJN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QDTY or XIJN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTY or XIJN?
- With every distribution reinvested, QDTY returned +20.2% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QDTY or XIJN?
- QDTY charges 1.17% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so XIJN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTY against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdty-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.