Data as of .
QQQI vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QQQI paid 15.2% of its price in cash against XIJN’s 6.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and XIJN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QQQI | Only in XIJN |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.58% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07 100.51% |
| Apple Inc 7.79% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.73 3.76% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.84% | US Dollar 0.76% |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.03% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.36% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.02% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.24% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.14% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | XIJN | QQQI | XIJN | QQQI | XIJN | |
| 3 months | −0.7% | +1.8% | 3.4% | 1.1% | +1.8 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +16.7% | +4.0% | 7.7% | 3.5% | −7.5 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | +16.4% | +6.2% | 15.2% | 6.9% | −5.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Since launch | +59.6% | +16.6% | 39.9% | 14.7% | −12.3 pts | −27.4 pts |
| QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | First Trust |
| Strategy | option income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 14.0% | 6.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 15.2% | 6.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | −0.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.4% | +6.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 98% | not published |
| Age | 962 days | 816 days |
| Net assets | $14.8bn | $53m |
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XIJN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QQQI or XIJN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or XIJN?
- With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +16.4% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QQQI or XIJN?
- QQQI charges 0.68% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.