Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

OVL vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQI paid 13.9% of its price in cash against OVL’s 9.9%, though OVL returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OVL and QQQI

Net assets: $427m on Aug 31, 2026 for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF, and $15.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF.

At a glance
9.9%
OVL cash paid, 1 year
13.9%
QQQI cash paid, 1 year
+17.2%
OVL total return, 1 year
+8.9%
QQQI total return, 1 year
OVL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.4 pts ahead of VOO
OVL
+17.2%
VOO
+14.8%

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

OVL over 1 year: paid 9.9%, price +6.6%, total +17.2%, VOO +14.8%, +2.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

OVL

+17.2%

9.9% of it arrived as cash

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

OVL over 1 year: paid 9.9%, price +6.6%, total +17.2%, VOO +14.8%, +2.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

OVL

+17.2%

9.9% cash

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

9.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OVL over 1 year: paid 9.9%, price +6.6%, total +17.2%, VOO +14.8%, +2.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.4 pts behind QQQ
QQQI
+8.9%
QQQ
+12.3%

3.4 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QQQI

+8.9%

13.9% of it arrived as cash

3.4 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.4 pts behind QQQ

QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QQQI

+8.9%

3.4 pts behind QQQ

13.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QQQI over 1 year: paid 13.9%, price −5.4%, total +8.9%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QQQI costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OVL vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOVLQQQI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+8.9%
Price change, 1 yearrose 6.6%fell 5.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOONasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.68%
Net assets, OVL as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQI as of Oct 28, 2026$427m$15.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OVL scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score81.7OVL42.2QQQI

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 142 weekly returns
OVL QQQI
Return
Total return edge OVL +59.9% +50.0%
Annualized edge OVL +18.8% +16.0%
Price return edge OVL +37.4% +1.4%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 16.2% 16.0%
Max drawdown edge QQQI (slight) −19.1% −18.4%
Downside capture 108.9% 85.5%
Beta 1.13 0.80
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge OVL 0.87 0.74
Sortino edge OVL 1.33 1.09
Treynor 0.130 0.148
Calmar edge OVL 0.98 0.87
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.6% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.66 −0.05
Information ratio 0.34 −0.66
Tracking error 3.4% 4.8%

Each against its own benchmark: OVL against VOO, Oct 11, 2019 to Oct 30, 2026; QQQI against QQQ, Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Feb 2024 to Oct 2026, OVL returned more: +59.9% to +50.0%. OVL and QQQI swung about the same: 16.2% and 16.0%. QQQI fell slightly less at its worst: −18.4% to −19.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: OVL vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOVLQQQIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+59.9%+50.0%OVLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.8%+16.0%OVLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+37.4%+1.4%OVLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.2%16.0%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.7%10.8%TieLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.1%−18.4%QQQI (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture121.3%69.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture108.9%85.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.130.80Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.990.98Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.870.74OVLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.331.09OVLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1300.148Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.980.87OVLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.6% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.66−0.05Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +1.2%−3.1% to +2.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.34−0.66Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.4%4.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 142 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, OVL and QQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OVL QQQI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in OVL
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 99.97%
Only in QQQI
NVIDIA Corp 8.08%
Apple Inc 7.88%
Microsoft Corp 6.31%
Amazon.com Inc 4.40%
Micron Technology Inc 4.34%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.56%
Tesla Inc 3.42%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF · Put-selling overlay on VOO, paying monthly QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
Strategy put-selling overlay option income
Benchmark Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 10.6% 14.7%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year 9.9% 13.9%
Price change, 1 year +6.6% −5.4%
Total return, 1 year +17.2% +8.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind +2.4 pts −3.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 7.1 years 2.8 years
Net assets, OVL as of Aug 31, 2026 and QQQI as of Oct 28, 2026 $427m $15.5bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OVL vs QQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowOVLQQQIOVLQQQIOVLQQQI
3 months−0.5%−2.2%2.6%3.5%−0.4 pts+1.3 pts
6 months+4.4%−0.2%5.2%6.9%−0.6 pts+0.1 pts
1 year+17.2%+8.9%9.9%13.9%+2.4 pts−3.4 pts
3 years+92.6%–23.9%–+9.3 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: OVL Oct 2019 · QQQI Jan 2024+204.4%+53.8%51.2%41.2%+14.4 pts−11.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
OVL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVL paid 9.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly. Overlay Shares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QQQI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQI paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.7%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OVL or QQQI?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVL paid 9.9% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 13.9%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OVL or QQQI?
With every distribution reinvested, OVL returned +17.2% and QQQI +8.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OVL or QQQI?
OVL charges 0.79% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OVL against QQQI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ovl-vs-qqqi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.