Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

OVL vs QDTE: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its price in cash against OVL’s 9.9%, though OVL returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OVL and QDTE

Net assets: $427m on Aug 31, 2026 for Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF, and $881m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

At a glance
9.9%
OVL cash paid, 1 year
34.7%
QDTE cash paid, 1 year
+17.2%
OVL total return, 1 year
+13.7%
QDTE total return, 1 year
OVL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.4 pts ahead of VOO
OVL
+17.2%
VOO
+14.8%

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

OVL over 1 year: paid 9.9%, price +6.6%, total +17.2%, VOO +14.8%, +2.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

OVL

+17.2%

9.9% of it arrived as cash

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

OVL over 1 year: paid 9.9%, price +6.6%, total +17.2%, VOO +14.8%, +2.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

OVL

+17.2%

9.9% cash

2.4 pts ahead of VOO

9.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OVL over 1 year: paid 9.9%, price +6.6%, total +17.2%, VOO +14.8%, +2.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QDTE · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE
+13.7%
QQQ
+12.3%

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTE

+13.7%

34.7% of it arrived as cash

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTE

+13.7%

34.7% as cash

1.4 pts ahead of QQQ

34.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

OVL costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OVL vs QDTE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOVLQDTE
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+13.7%
Price change, 1 yearrose 6.6%fell 23.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOONasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.96%
Net assets, OVL as of Aug 31, 2026 and QDTE as of Nov 4, 2026$427m$881m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OVL scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score81.7OVL32.6QDTE

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 137 weekly returns
OVL QDTE
Return
Total return edge QDTE (slight) +55.7% +58.0%
Annualized edge QDTE (slight) +18.3% +19.0%
Price return edge OVL +33.8% −40.2%
Risk
Volatility edge OVL (slight) 16.5% 17.8%
Max drawdown edge OVL (slight) −19.1% −20.5%
Downside capture 108.9% 91.4%
Beta 1.13 0.85
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.84 0.83
Sortino edge OVL (slight) 1.28 1.20
Treynor 0.130 0.172
Calmar edge OVL (slight) 0.96 0.92
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.6% a year +1.1% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.66 0.37
Information ratio 0.34 −0.22
Tracking error 3.4% 5.7%

Each against its own benchmark: OVL against VOO, Oct 11, 2019 to Oct 30, 2026; QDTE against QQQ, Mar 15, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Mar 2024 to Oct 2026, QDTE returned slightly more: +58.0% to +55.7%. OVL swung slightly less: 16.5% to 17.8%. OVL fell slightly less at its worst: −19.1% to −20.5%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: OVL vs QDTE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureOVLQDTEEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+55.7%+58.0%QDTE (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+18.3%+19.0%QDTE (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+33.8%−40.2%OVLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.5%17.8%OVL (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation10.9%12.2%OVLLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.1%−20.5%OVL (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture121.3%81.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture108.9%91.4%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.130.85Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.990.93Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.840.83TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.281.20OVL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1300.172Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.960.92OVL (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.6% a year+1.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.660.37Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +1.2%−4.8% to +7.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.34−0.22Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.4%5.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 137 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, OVL and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OVL QDTE
Only in one fund ↓
Only in OVL
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 99.97%
Only in QDTE
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 73.55%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.69%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF · Put-selling overlay on VOO, paying monthly QDTE Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
Strategy put-selling overlay 0DTE covered call
Benchmark Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 10.6% 27.9%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year 9.9% 34.7%
Price change, 1 year +6.6% −23.4%
Total return, 1 year +17.2% +13.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind +2.4 pts +1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 7.1 years 2.7 years
Net assets, OVL as of Aug 31, 2026 and QDTE as of Nov 4, 2026 $427m $881m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OVL vs QDTE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowOVLQDTEOVLQDTEOVLQDTE
3 months−0.5%−1.6%2.6%6.3%−0.4 pts+1.8 pts
6 months+4.4%+1.6%5.2%14.3%−0.6 pts+2.0 pts
1 year+17.2%+13.7%9.9%34.7%+2.4 pts+1.5 pts
3 years+92.6%–23.9%–+9.3 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: OVL Oct 2019 · QDTE Mar 2024+204.4%+55.2%51.2%75.6%+14.4 pts−2.3 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QDTE flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
OVL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVL paid 9.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly. Overlay Shares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QDTE

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 23.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OVL or QDTE?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVL paid 9.9% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 34.7%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OVL or QDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, OVL returned +17.2% and QDTE +13.7% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OVL or QDTE?
OVL charges 0.79% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so OVL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OVL against QDTE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ovl-vs-qdte

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.