Data as of .
QDTE vs TSPY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against TSPY’s 14.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TSPY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and TSPY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTE | Only in TSPY |
|---|---|
| NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77% | |
| NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64% | |
| QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82% | |
| Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97% | |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 3.90% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTE | TSPY | QDTE | TSPY | QDTE | TSPY | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | +2.3% | 7.6% | 3.5% | +1.6 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 6 months | +19.7% | +16.4% | 16.2% | 7.6% | −4.5 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 1 year | +21.1% | +15.1% | 36.1% | 14.1% | −0.7 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +59.9% | +37.3% | 74.1% | 28.7% | −4.3 pts | −4.0 pts |
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | TappAlpha |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 20.8% | 14.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.77% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 36.1% | 14.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −19.2% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.1% | +15.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.7 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 925 days | 764 days |
| Net assets | $967m | $311m |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.
TSPY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TSPY paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QDTE or TSPY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting price in cash and TSPY paid 14.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or TSPY?
- With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +21.1% and TSPY returned +15.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or TSPY?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and TSPY charges 0.77%, so TSPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against TSPY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-tspy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.