Data as of .
OMAH vs YLDE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against YLDE’s 7.6%, though YLDE returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and YLDE hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | YLDE |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 3.60% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.94% | 2.00% |
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 1.91% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in YLDE |
|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE) 4.63% |
| American Express Co 6.57% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 4.05% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | NVIDIA CORP 3.03% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | NESTLE' SA/AG 2.94% |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC 2.83% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 2.78% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | MICROSOFT CORP 2.67% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.54% | UNILEVER PLC 2.64% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | YLDE | OMAH | YLDE | OMAH | YLDE | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +2.5% | 3.7% | 2.3% | −2.4 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +8.4% | 7.7% | 4.1% | +2.8 pts | −9.6 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +10.5% | 14.4% | 7.6% | +4.9 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +51.1% | not published | 16.8% | not published | −27.3 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +181.4% | 21.4% | 42.1% | +12.4 pts | −86.6 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | YLDE Franklin ClearBridge Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Franklin |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 7.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.48% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 7.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +2.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +10.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 3405 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $170m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
YLDE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YLDE paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or YLDE?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and YLDE paid 7.6%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or YLDE?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and YLDE returned +10.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YLDE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or YLDE?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and YLDE charges 0.48%, so YLDE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against YLDE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-ylde Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.