Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OCTH vs OCTJ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year OCTH paid 6.3% of its price in cash against OCTJ’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October.

6.3%OCTH cash paid, 1 year
5.2%OCTJ cash paid, 1 year
+6.7%OCTH total return, 1 year
+5.5%OCTJ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OCTH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

OCTH 45.2OCTJ 42.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

OCTH9.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%6.3% of it arrived as cash9.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%9.9 pts behind SPY
OCTJ11.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%5.2% of it arrived as cash11.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%11.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OCTH and OCTJ hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions OCTH and OCTJ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingOCTHOCTJ
TREASURY BILL98.41%98.69%
TREASURY BILL1.59%1.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OCTH and OCTJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OCTHOCTJOCTHOCTJOCTHOCTJ
3 months+1.3%+1.1%1.6%1.3%−1.0 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+5.5%+4.0%3.3%2.7%−12.5 pts−14.1 pts
1 year+6.7%+5.5%6.3%5.2%−9.9 pts−11.1 pts
Since launch+22.9%+18.9%19.1%15.9%−61.9 pts−66.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OCTH and OCTJ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OCTH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
OCTJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
Strategydefined incomedefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized6.4%5.3%
Expense ratio0.79%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year6.3%5.2%
Price change, 1 year0.0%+0.1%
Total return, 1 year+6.7%+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−9.9 pts−11.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1082 days1082 days
Net assets$16m$15m

OCTH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid quarterly.

OCTJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OCTH or OCTJ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTH paid 6.3% of its starting price in cash and OCTJ paid 5.2%, so OCTH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OCTH or OCTJ?
With every distribution reinvested, OCTH returned +6.7% and OCTJ returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OCTH returned more.
Which is cheaper, OCTH or OCTJ?
OCTH charges 0.79% a year and OCTJ charges 0.79%, so OCTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OCTH against OCTJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OCTH against OCTJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/octh-vs-octj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources