Data as of .
ACKY vs OCTH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year ACKY paid 13.9% of its price in cash against OCTH’s 6.3%, though OCTH returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OCTH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and OCTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACKY | Only in OCTH |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 11.56% | TREASURY BILL 98.41% |
| Brookfield Corp 11.16% | TREASURY BILL 1.59% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 10.74% | |
| Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 10.23% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 9.95% | |
| Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86% | |
| Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACKY | OCTH | ACKY | OCTH | ACKY | OCTH | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +1.3% | 3.7% | 1.6% | −1.5 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +5.8% | +5.5% | 7.7% | 3.3% | −12.2 pts | −12.5 pts |
| 1 year | −1.3% | +6.7% | 13.9% | 6.3% | −17.9 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Since launch | −0.4% | +22.9% | 14.0% | 19.1% | −19.1 pts | −61.9 pts |
| ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Innovator |
| Strategy | covered call | defined income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | quarterly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.7% | 6.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.9% | 6.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −15.1% | 0.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.3% | +6.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −17.9 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 374 days | 1082 days |
| Net assets | $45m | $16m |
ACKY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.
OCTH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, ACKY or OCTH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and OCTH paid 6.3%, so ACKY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or OCTH?
- With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned −1.3% and OCTH returned +6.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OCTH returned more.
- Which is cheaper, ACKY or OCTH?
- ACKY charges 0.95% a year and OCTH charges 0.79%, so OCTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against OCTH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-octh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.