METW vs XVMT: which paid, and which earned it?
METW and XVMT both write options for income. Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF and FT Vest META & Target Income ETF.
6 pts behind META
METW over 1 year: paid 26.6%, price −36.8%, total −6.9%, META −0.9%, −6.0 pts.
META
−0.9%
METW
−6.9%
6 pts behind META
Total return, distributions reinvested
6 pts behind META
METW over 1 year: paid 26.6%, price −36.8%, total −6.9%, META −0.9%, −6.0 pts.
META
−0.9%
METW
−6.9%
6 pts behind META
26.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. METW over 1 year: paid 26.6%, price −36.8%, total −6.9%, META −0.9%, −6.0 pts.
About even with META
XVMT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, META −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
META
−2.5%
XVMT
−2.1%
about even with META
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with META
XVMT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, META −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
META
−2.5%
XVMT
−2.1%
about even with META
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to −0.9%. XVMT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, META −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, METW and XVMT hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
23% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | METW | XVMT | METW | XVMT | METW | XVMT |
| 3 months | +21.0% | not published | 10.1% | not published | +2.6 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +28.2% | not published | 18.8% | not published | +2.8 pts | not published |
| 1 year | −6.9% | not published | 26.6% | not published | −6.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch METW Jun 2025 · XVMT Sep 2026 | −1.1% | −2.1% | 38.3% | 0.0% | −5.8 pts | +0.4 pts |
METW and XVMT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
METW and XVMT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
METW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, METW paid 26.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 36.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.9%. (META) returned −0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.9%, paid weekly.
XVMT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, XVMT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. (META) returned −2.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, METW against XVMT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/metw-vs-xvmt
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, METW against XVMT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/metw-vs-xvmt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, METW against XVMT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/metw-vs-xvmt
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). METW against XVMT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/metw-vs-xvmt
- Markdown
- [METW against XVMT (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/metw-vs-xvmt)